Hi Please join my PEACE ASSAULT ON THE TWITTERSPHERE! Do you have a Twitter account? If you do you are in a position to help me rid our world of all WMDs and put an end to war. If you want to live in a peaceful world - free from the constant threat of nuclear annihilation - please join me in my quest to transform our world and usher in a viable future for the generations yet to come. We owe it to those who are yet to be born - we have to do this. Those that are willing to help should copy and paste the text below into the tweet compose box on their twitter page: Universal Peace: it's a no-brainer: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-universal-peace-petition?source=c.em.cp&r_by=10024033 Please post the words - as is - as I have chosen them very carefully to send the right message. You might also try sending that message directly to a few of your friends/associates - this would give it a personal appeal. Other ways in which you could help further spread this peace message are by posting the link directly into your FaceBook timeline or even sending it out via email. I would welcome any action that spreads awareness of my peace initiative and motivates people to sign my petition. The aim here is to transform the link in that text into a viral entity - with a life of its own. If you wish to go directly to MoveOn.org and sign my petition - here's the link again: You could - if you choose to take action - be part of something big here. A global phenomenon that finally brings peace to our world.
Please think carefully about what you do next. Whether you choose to declare for peace or - instead - do nothing but sit and silently await the war to come. It's up to you now. Many thanks. Peace, Love & Respect. peter dunn
0 Comments
This is from a statement released by the White House: "Obama called President Mohamed Morsi to warn him that the voices of all Egyptians must be heard" So the US President is advising his Egyptian counterpart that he should pay more attention to what is being said on the streets of Cairo and elsewhere. Perhaps he needs to follow his own advice. Perhaps he – himself – should listen to this guy: It would, as well, appear that the protesters in Tahrir Square do not like the way the US media is reporting on events there - and would like, too, for the American public to appreciate their evaluation of President Obama's intellectual capacity. Lastly, these guys have something serious to say about Obama's choice of fellow-travelers. I doubt – very much – that any of these images will be appearing in the US or UK media anytime soon. Which shouldn't surprise us. Given that our media and politicians are busting a gut to keep us dis-informed about the true situation in the Middle East.
Which is why – dear reader – I would ask you to share this post with a friend. You do – after all – like to keep your friends informed: don't you? If you want peace in your world then you need to get pro-active.
Message delivered by chemtrail? The aerial equivalent of a poison pen letter perhaps?
Any thoughts? Please leave your comments below. All the best. pd Every picture tells a story – right? Well, maybe, once-upon-a-time. Nowadays a picture can tell several stories. With modern technology/software the story a picture tells can be modified, or even changed out of all recognition, mid-narrative: as the tale itself unfolds. And this is most certainly true of the events in Boston: on the occasion of the marathon staged there on April 15. We have all seen the plethora of images captured by cameras and camcorders at the marathon. And we have all read/heard the 'official' story of what those images depict. But – when we examine those pictures closely – does the story match up with what they are showing us? Or has any of the images been modified to tell us a different story: a different version of the events that actually unfolded on the day? Let's examine some of those images. Our first image shows suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev leaving the scene of the Boston bombing after planting a pressure cooker bomb hidden in a black backpack: according to the 'official' story of course. We can tell that this image was taken after the bombs exploded on Boylston Street because we have panicking people running down the road and Dzhokhar doesn't appear to have his backpack with him. Hmmm. Now there has been a lot of people commenting online about this image. They point out that Dzhokhar's left arm is out-of-proportion to the rest of his body. They further argue that this indicates that the arm has been 'photoshopped' – enlarged - to disguise the fact that Dzhokhar is still in possession of the backpack that he allegedly left at the scene of the atrocity. OK. Let's examine this claim. Here is that same picture again. Please note that I have adjusted the contrast of this image to give us a better view of Dzhokhar's left arm against the dark background. In all other respects (proportion ETC) it is exactly the same as the first image. Now that we can see it more clearly that arm does seem a little over-large, wouldn't you say? But we don't have to leave it there: making guesstimates and arguing over our own individual estimations. With digital images we can do something more constructive. Like this. Here I've superimposed two lines onto the image. One (the cyan line) running down from Dzhokhar's shoulder to his elbow. And the other (the yellow line) running from his elbow to the ends (approximately) of his fingers. So – taken together – these two lines approximate the length of Dzhokhar's left arm in proportion to the rest of his body as depicted in this picture. Right? Now let's see what these lines – representing the length of that left arm - look like when turned: end-to-end, into a vertical position. Well. According to what we are looking at here, Dzhokhar's left arm is – indeed - way out of proportion to the rest of his body. The tips of his fingers should be able to reach down no lower than mid-thigh; here they appear to be able to reach down to at least the level of his knees. Check out this anatomical diagram for comparison. It would appear, then, that this image of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been 'photoshopped' to disguise the fact that he left the scene of the Boston bombing with his backpack. That would mean that he didn't plant a bomb: that he is an innocent man. It would also mean that the events at Boston constituted a false flag operation. Not convinced? Then let's have a look at some more images. This is the – now famous – 'floating leg' image. So called because it shows a leg and foot (arrowed) that doesn't appear to belong to anyone. However – despite this proving that this image has indeed been 'photoshopped' – it isn't why I'm using it. Here, I would - instead - like the reader to consider something else. (NB – there is also another major photographic anomaly in this picture. See if you can spot it) No, what I want the reader to do is compare the picture above - with the picture below. This second picture was taken shortly after the first. (Check out where the guy in the orange shirt: with the collar turned up, and punisher logo cap is in both pictures.) Now please look at the three people indicated. What are they doing? They are looking straight at the camera/person taking these pictures. They can clearly see the person taking these pictures. These three people know that they are having their picture taken. Now consider Dzhokhar. Remember, he is on a mission: a secret terror mission, to plant a bomb at the Boston marathon. We know that this has to be a secret terror mission because we have been informed – by the authorities – that both he and his brother: Tamurlan, were planning further terrorist attacks. They wouldn't be able to carry out those further attacks if they botched this mission and got themselves arrested. So remaining incognito – disguising their presence – at the Boston event was of paramount importance. Yet here we see Dzhokhar in plain view. Not only that – Dzhokhar must also be able to see the person that is taking his picture. He knows he is being photographed. And yet he makes no attempt to prevent this evidence: of his presence at the event, from being gathered. And he does this at least twice. Could this be because he believes that he has nothing to hide? We must also – here – consider the person taking these pictures. What can we deduce about this guy? First of all it isn't hard – when looking at these two images – to figure out that the person taking them has to be stood in the road: not on the sidewalk. At Boston all the spectators (general public) were confined to standing behind barriers on the pavement/sidewalk. This guy isn't – therefore we can safely assume that this guy has to be a badge wearing official of some kind. (Again, one has to wonder about Dzhokhar's motives when he allowed this person to photograph him without attempting to hide himself.) The next thing to consider is: what – or who – is the subject of the photographs that this guy is taking? Is this guy just taking general images of the marathon: merely recording the event? Or has he a specific target: a person-of-interest, that he wants to photograph? Here I have placed 'cross hairs' over the center of both images. These enable us to deduce that Dzhokhar occupies a central position in both photographs: which were – remember – taken a moment or so apart (the time it took the guy in the orange shirt to get from where he is in the first picture to where is in the second). It would appear – then – that Dzhokhar : along with his brother Tamurlan (partially hidden to the left of Dzhokhar in the second image) is the subject of these photographs. This does mean – of course – that the Tsarnaev brothers were 'persons-of-interest' to the guy taking these images before those two 'bombs' detonated on Boylston Street. This would bear out the claims: made by the mother of the suspects, that the FBI had an ongoing relationship (were in contact with) Tamurlan in the years preceding the Boston incident. There is simply no getting away from it my friends. What we witnessed in Boston was a staged event. A false flag operation. That is what happened. The question we need to answer now is why it happened. I would like, now, to present how some people reacted to this incident: by showing you the views they expressed in the aftermath. All of the following comments were posted to LiveLeak.com. 'i want the west to declare open season on all Muslim immigrants that have beards' 'burn the cunt alive' (this was actually said of the suspect's mother). 'It is what we(the free thinkers) have been saying for the last few years. "Islam is Evil".' 'It's going to be hell for Muslims in Boston, and I don't give one flying fuck. I hope the sentiment grows in fact.' 'I never thought I could detest a religion, or one's beliefs in general. But enough is enough. Get the fuck out of western civilization, there's no place for you here.' '....... a very sad moment in our history...........brought to you by islam.............' 'If only one percent of muslims are extremists, that is more than the complete size of our US military. Understand people what we are up against.' 'We need protection they need to ban Islam A religion that condones death of innocent people shouldn't be allowed' 'Something has to be done to fight Islam cancer of the earth' 'the drones will speak the language of peace' These comments are fairly typical. You will find similar views expressed: on websites that feature forums and message boards discussing the Boston incident, all over the web. The truly sad thing here is, this is exactly what those that planned and executed the Boston false flag operation were after. Their aim was - and is - to inculcate hatred of Islam in the collective psyche of the Christian west. To a large extent – they seem to have succeeded. They have convinced the people that hold these views that all Muslims are their enemies. And – more ominously still – it doesn't end there. There is also a flip side to all of this. The real plotters behind Boston are not only actively spreading hatred of Islam. They are also spreading hatred of Christianity amongst the Muslim populations of the east. This is how they are doing it. They are using these. To do this: And this: I could go on.
So what is the point of all this death and mayhem? Why – to create more death and mayhem of course. For out of death and mayhem comes that which the rich and powerful seek above all else: pure profit. The rich and powerful are plotting out our collective future. They are planning for us to go to war: the Christian west versus the Muslim east. They will amass enormous profits from this conflict by lending the participating nations the money: to pay for the weapons, which we will then use to kill one another. And the really sickening thing is that the banks do not have the money in the first place. They will only 'create' the money: out of thin-air, once we have agreed to owe it them. In other words – we will be fighting and dying for precisely nothing. Please be aware that there isn't much time left – now – before the rich and powerful put their plans for us into action. All that's holding them back is the fact that two of the biggest players in the coming conflict: Syria and Iran, are not yet integrated into the enslavement-through-debt system of control by the global banking cartel. Neither of these two countries owe the IMF a dime. In order for the cartel to maximize the profits from the coming war this has to change. This is why Syria, followed by Iran, are going to be attacked. Once these two are defeated the stage will be set for the main event. A perpetual war without frontiers. A war that will see us all totally subjugated: powerless, under martial law. A war designed to depopulate Planet Earth. You now need to ask yourself the most important question that you'll ever be asked: do you want this war? Are you prepared to go along with this insanity? If you are not prepared to condone this madness then you need to register your opposition to this war right now. Please stand up and tell the entire world that you reject all wars and weapons of mass destruction. You can do this by signing my petition hosted on Change.org. It is called 'End the Madness'. Please use this link: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-universal-peace-petition?source=c.em.cp&r_by=10024033 I know that signing my petition only constitutes one small step along the road to peace. But we all need to take that first step. And we all need to take it together. We are one. No more war. Peace, Love & Respect peter dunn Look long and hard at the images on this page. Then hang your head in shame; as we must all hang our heads in shame. Because this is our work. We are to blame for these atrocities. We are all to blame because we didn't do enough to prevent such terrible events from happening. It mightn't have been our fingers on the triggers that fired the missiles that tore the bodies of these young children to pieces. But we did stand idly by and let it happen. And we continue to stand idly by. Do you like being complicit in murder? I don't. How many children have to die before we stand up and say, 'No More!'? When will our common humanity become outraged enough to compel us to actually do something about these dreadful, inhumane crimes committed against innocent children? You know that if we don't do something – anything, whatever it takes – to put a stop to this madness then it is only going to get worse. Much, much worse. We are being conditioned to accept the inevitability of war and death on a massive scale. We are repeatedly exposed to this lie every time we pick up a paper, watch the news on TV, go to see the latest Hollywood blockbuster or listen to the pronouncements our 'leaders' make about, 'The War on Terror'. The people that are responsible for this all pervasive disinformation/propaganda campaign are also those that will amass many billions of dollars in profit by lending us the money, to pay for the weapons, that we will then use to kill one another. And they don't care how many lives will be lost in the process. They don't want us to care either. They just want us to stand idly by until it's our turn to die. Well, do you care? Do you care enough to actually do something? Please help me put a stop to this: Please help me rid our world of all weapons of mass destruction and put an end to war. Please sign my petition: Petition: End the Madness on Change.org http://www.change.org/petitions/end-the-madness?utm_campaign=petition_created_email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=guides Addendum
Dear friends, I am making this article available to download in pdf format. If you wish to play an active role in putting an end to the madness of war, please download this pdf and send it - as an attachment to an email - to your friends. In this way you will be helping me obtain more signatures for my petition. Help me awaken the world to the horror. Download pdf. Many thanks Peace, Love & Respect peterxdunn Can you define what, 'To be free', actually means? Perhaps youv'e got a nice, pithy little homily that perfectly describes 'Freedom' in a couple of short sentences? If so then perhaps you could write it down and post it somewhere for us all to read. I mean, when you refer to 'Freedom' are you talking about being 'Free', to do something that you aren't able to at the moment? Or perhaps you are talking about being, 'Free', of the impositions and obligations placed upon you by others? When we talk about 'freedom', what is it – exactly – that we are talking about? Are we – all of us - even talking about the same thing? Freedom – and how to define it – isn't as straightforward a concept as most people would imagine. Yet still some insist on using phrases such as: 'The Free World'. Indeed, there are those that believe themselves to be living in such a state of grace: 'In the land of the free'. But have these people ever taken the time – and expended the necessary intellectual effort – to examine what freedom is and so determine whether or not they actually possess it? I think not. Far too many of us have been persuaded - too many of us have accepted without question - that democracy: as it is currently constituted in the developed, western world, equates with freedom. It doesn't. How can participating in a charade: called an election, every four years, and voting for people whom we wouldn't trust as far as we could spit, be considered, 'Freedom'? How, indeed, can it be called democracy? Blair, Bush, Cheney and Condoleeza Rice, et al, lied to us about Iraq and over a million innocent people died as a result. Tell me, when were we ever consulted about our participation in such hideous slaughter? They also lied to us about Afghanistan and the bastards that succeeded them in office are still lying to us about Afghanistan. When are they going to come clean and tell us that this war and occupation are being prosecuted on behalf of the energy corporations that need a pipe-line route out – across Afghanistan – for the natural gas that lies under the ground in Turkmenistan (a brutally corrupt shamocracy/dictatorship) next door? The pipeline that will bring this wealth out to the World has to transit Afghanistan. There are two other possible routes: one through Russia and the other through Iran. Neither of these is acceptable to America. America has to control the flow of this material so as to ensure that – when it is sold on the markets – the currency used for every transaction is the American Dollar. If America fails in this then the dollar: already weakened by the truly colossal amount of debt swamping the US economy - and already being abandoned by some of the emerging economies - will lose its status as the World's first reserve currency and the Great Dollar Empire will fall. This perfectly illustrates the fact that – when it comes to the big issues – we aren't even told what those issues are. How can we as electors make informed choices when we aren't given the relevant information with which to make those choices? And then, of course, there is Iran. It doesn't matter which of your country's political parties that you vote for at the next election – the banks and big oil want Iran to be attacked and brought to its knees so that they can plunder its economy and natural resources – and your government: whether of the left, right or center, is going to oblige them. And this despite the total lack of any credible evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Now where in this grand scheme is your personal point of view being taken into account? Think carefully. In all liklihood war against Iran will spread to engulf the Middle East and then the entire World. Is this what you want? If not then how are you going to get that message across? By voting for some snake-oil salesman: that promises one thing, and then does the opposite, at the next election? I don't think so. And what about your current financial status? You might not, at the moment, have any unpaid loans outstanding with your bank but you still – nonetheless – owe the banking system tens of thousands of Dollars/Euros/Pounds (whatever). This is because your government indebted you with the privately owned, criminally corrupt banking cartel on your behalf. They did this: under the auspices of the bail-out regime, because the banks told them to do this. Now if our governments weren't allowed to exercise any other options in that situation, where did it leave us? What democratic options/choices were we allowed to exercise? Answer: zero, zilch. So we are now left in an impossible situation: trying to pay off our debts to the banks using money – created by the banks – that has interest attached at source. Ergo, the more money we pay back, the more interest we incur. Therefore: despite all the lies our governments tell us to the contrary, the national debt that we owe to the banks cannot – ever – be repaid in full. They've got us all going round in circles here: on a treadmill that we can never get off. So we need to ask ourselves: when was it – exactly – that we elected to place ourselves in this impossible situation? Furthermore, it is this situation with the banks: the way in which they are now dictating economic policy – think austerity here – directly to our governments that reveals exactly who it is that exercises executive power over our economies. So what is the point of voting a government: of whatever cosmetic complexion (there aren't any real differences between political parties despite what their manifestos claim), into office when it is the banks that are running the show? No, our personal points of view have no relevance for the elites that really control our World. And, by casting our worthless votes, we are just participating in the Grand Delusion. All that the usurers: the money lenders in the temple, want from us is blind obedience. Stay home, shut up and watch the TV. (I could have added: 'You dumb-ass, useless mouths', for this is what they sneeringly perceive us to be). Now, if you are happy to continue deluding yourself that everything in the garden is hunky dory, you needn't read any further. On the other hand, if you wish to explore ways in which we might circumvent the power of the elites, and seize back control over our own lives – then please – read on. The concept that we really should be looking at here is devolution. Devolution involves the de-centralization of power from a central government to the regions that comprise a country. Here in the UK for example, we have seen the limited devolvement of power from London, with the setting up of parliaments in both Wales and Scotland. There are those in Scotland, though, whom deem this insufficient and actively seek secession from the United Kingdom altogether. (I say, good luck to them.) Now what I have in mind is to take the concept of devolution: as described above, and apply its principles in a radically extreme fashion. Instead of just devolving power on a regional basis, we go all the way: we devolve soveriegn power directly to/upon the individual citizen. If you want to be truly free, and take back control over your own life and future, you have to assume the responsibilities of governance. I know this sounds like a pretty tall order but you should bear in mind that politicians do not actively run countries. Virtually all of the work required to manage a country's day-to-day affairs is performed by civil servants/administrators. This will still be the case under a directly democratic system. So how would we go about placing ourselves at the heart of the decision making process? The key word here is consultation. We now possess the technical ability: made available to us by advances in computer technology, to collect, process and store enormous amounts of information. It is this ability that makes devolution-to-the-max possible, for with it we are now able to consult with – and register the aspirations of – an entire population. This is, pretty much, how it will work. Everyone is given access to a computer. Throughout the calendar year: each month perhaps, a large tranche of electors will be selected completely at random. Those selected must then make themselves available to be consulted. This will involve sitting down and filling in questionaires on a computer terminal. They will also be given the opportunity to propose legislation of their own. Once an elector has been selected and consulted their name will then be eliminated from the selection process for the rest of that calendar year. In this way the random selection process will eventually require all those of electoral age to submit themselves for consultation. Any interference with this process: such as the covert manipulation of the data collected, will be deemed treasonable and carry a mandatory ten year prison sentence. Once the aspirations of the populace have been made manifest in this manner they will be passed into law and enacted/actioned by salaried civil servants/administrators who will be paid in accordance with their ability to deliver the wishes of the people. Should they under perform in any respect, we simply fire them. However, we will need more than just a consultation process. We are also going to need a Bill of Universal Rights that defines what it means to be a citizen. This will set out: what we are – and are not - free to do, what and whom we are protected from, and what our responsibilities are. One of the main reasons we will need this bill is to protect the rights of minorities from being infringed by a prejudiced majority acting against them. Under a directly democratic system there will be no persecution directed toward anybody. Everybody's rights will be held sacrosanct under the law. And no laws will be enacted that contravene this first principle. Another thing we are going to need – and this by the shed load – is information. We cannot, ourselves, determine how to respond to any given issue if we are not even aware that there is a situation that requires our attention. This is how it stands at the moment. Our governments deal with 'issues' in secret: often using subterfuge to dress a situation up to make it appear like something else altogether. Take Afghanistan for instance. Afghanistan - we are told – is all about spreading the democratic principle and ensuring that Afghan girls receive an education. But we already know the ugly truth of this situation don't we. Afghanistan – as we have already seen - is all about the natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan next door.Then there was the bullshit they told us about Saddam Hussein. We were told: amongst other things, that this guy had to go because he was a murderous dictator. And so he was. But they conveniently neglected to inform us that he had always been a murderous dictator. And that they have always known this. George Bush Snr knew this when he presented Saddam with a cake baked by his wife, Barbara. What changed things during G W Bush's tenure in the White House was Saddam's decision to reject the US Dollar in favour of the Euro in payment for Iraq's oil exports. (Challenging the supremacy of the World's numero uno, privately issued, debt based currency in this fashion has always proven fatal. Ask any assassinated American President or Gaddafi's ghost) In fact, our governments, and those they really represent: the banksters and corporations, have never had a problem with dictators per se. Check out the CIA's record for creating dictatorships – you'll see what I mean. There is a valuble lesson to be learned here. That is: if we continue to place our trust in politicians that keep secrets – that keep vital information from us - and lie about the true nature of World events then we will, ultimately, be led into wars that only serve the interests of the 1%. So think about it, if we get rid of the politicians, we also get rid of the lies and secrets. Indeed, we might, if direct democracy takes hold and spreads around the globe, even put an end to war altogether. Now wouldn't that be something.
You will, I hope, by now appreciate that democracy cannot exist in the absence of information – in the absence of truth. This is why, under a directly democratic, totally transparent system, there will be no secrecy. Finally, there is one last ingredient that we'll need to make direct democracy work and free us all from enslavement under a debt based monetary system controlled by the privately owned banks. (I have written about this subject at greater length in a previous article.) We need to exercise our soveriegn right to issue our own currencies that are free of debt. We need to take back the Money Power. At the moment the total amount of money in circulation within any given economy is controlled entirely by the banks. This gives the banks the power to hold us all to ransom. We either do what the banks want us to do: which is communicated to us via our governments (the semblance of democracy has to be maintained), or the banks will severely contract the supply of money and cause a recession/depression. They are also capable of upping the ante even further to bring about catastrophic financial collapse. This is the bottom line folks. This is the yoke that you currently wear around your neck. What is more, the banks are – at the moment – deliberately reducing the supply of money (see my last article). Why? Because they want to extend and entrench their power over us. They want us to go to war, and have us all live under martial law forevermore. This is serious shit people. And we all need to wake up to the fact. (Please give the guy next to you a nudge.) The Money Power cannot be left under the control of the banks. It rightfully belongs to us, so we must set up our own monetary system and take it back from them. To finish up here I would ask my readers to consider the events that are, right now, unfolding around the world. Specifically I would ask you all to ponder the significance of the many democracy movements that are emerging everywhere, with people taking to the streets in defiance of the brutal repression: coordinated at the highest levels of government, finance and industry, deployed against them. Ask yourselves: what do these people want? They march, and sometimes they are killed as they march. But still they march. What is it that these people believe in so passionately, that drives them to do this? They are obviously dissatisfied with democracy as it is currently constituted. Yet this is still their call: 'Democracy!' What kind of democracy is it that these brave souls seek? Perhaps they aren't that sure themselves. They just know there has to be another way. Which is really all I've shown you here. Just another way. The thing is – if we are to live in a free and fair world – then it is probably the only way. Peace, Love & Respect peter dunn This article is a companion piece to 'The Value of Money', which you will find by scrolling down this page. The dialogue between extraterrestrial civilizations and the human race has already begun. And it's about time you started paying attention: because the subject matter of this discussion has profound implications for our collective future here on Planet Earth. So, if you want to find out how you can take part in this historic conversation, all you need do is read on. The basic message: that our visitors from across the Cosmos are trying to communicate to us, couldn't be simpler; they want us to live in peace. They have a very good reason for wanting this. And it isn't just a case of them wanting what is best for the human race. They also want what is best for themselves. Now, in order to understand ET's motivations here, we need to understand something about the fundamental nature of the Universe: and the true nature of existence itself. Most people are familiar with Einstein's concept of 'space-time', but how many have really understood it? You need to think about it this way: space (the warp) and time (the weft) are woven together to form the fabric of the Cosmos. This fabric – imagine it to be a tapestry if you like – extends outwards in all directions to infinity. Now to cross that fabric in any meaningful way – to travel interstellar, or even intergalactic, distances – we need to overcome more than just the spatial dimensionality of our reality; we also need to conquer the temporal dimensionality bound up within space-time. Therefore, we cannot just cross space – we must also travel through time. ( Achieving this mightn't be as difficult as many would have you believe. Please download – and read – this pdf document: Alien Technology Explained.) And this is what worries ET. At the moment alien technology is, perhaps, a million years more advanced than ours. At the moment we do not threaten extraterrestrials in any way. But what happens if we achieve interstellar travel? What happens when we are able to travel back through time and attack ET's homeworld whilst it is still in its technological infancy? So ask yourself - what would you do if you were The Extraterrestrial? Bear in mind that our visitors have already seen what we do to our own kind. They have witnessed the horrendous crimes that we perpetrate against each other. Now, if you were ET, would you allow us: along with our pathologically murderous mentality, to spread out across the Milky Way Galaxy? This is why we must – as a race – grow up and embrace peace. We must do this for our own sakes and for the generations yet to come. We must do this so that: at some future date, we can stand - as equals - face to face with ET and embrace him. Now let's get back to that conversation and look at some background material. On the 16 September 1994 an alien visitor to our world delivered a terrifying message: describing the nuclear apocalypse that will befall us if we do not change our suicidal behaviour, to a group of 62 schoolchildren at Ariel Elementary School in Ruwa, a small rural township situated 20 kilometers from Harare in Zimbabwe. I am not going to set out the testimony to this encounter: elicited from these children by celebrated psychiatrist John E Mack, here. Instead I would like the reader to hear this remarkable testimony delivered directly from the children themselves. Please use this link: to a short YouTube video, to begin your research into this event. http://youtu.be/aabVQPlNR4E Personally, I found the guiless, wide-eyed sincerity with which these young students tell their disturbing story to be totally convincing. We must also consider the motives of the messenger here. What prompted this alien to cross the vastness of interstellar space to deliver his message? Why did he choose 62 schoolchildren – instead of a powerful head of state – to be the recipients of his dire warning? There are two logical conclusions that can be drawn here. The first of these is that alien civilizations are concerned about our future and wish to communicate their concerns to us. The second is that they don't trust our 'leaders' to pass on their message accurately and honestly. They chose the children because they knew that their message would be passed on without being modified to suit anyone's agenda or political considerations. By now you should be aware of at least one thing for sure: that message is intended for you. How you will respond to it, however, is entirely up to yourself. Besides attempting to communicate his concerns by telepathically implanting apocalyptic visions of mankind's demise in the minds of young schoolchildren, ET has also taken direct action that clearly demonstrates his opposition to our weapons of mass destruction. Evidence to support this emerged at the first Disclosure Project presentation: organized by Dr Steven Greer. Among the many eyewitnesses - to otherworldly encounters - that took the stage on May 9th 2001 was a guy called Robert Salas. Mr Salas had served as a captain in the United Sates Air Force back in the sixties and seventies. His testimony at the Disclosure Project centered around an incident that occurred in 1967 when he was serving as a deputy missile combat crew commander at an ICBM (inter-continental ballistic missile: equipped with warheads that possess vastly more destructive power than the Hiroshima bomb) launch facility in Montana. The facility consisted of ten launch silos: each containing one Minuteman missile. Whilst on duty: in the underground command center, at the site near Malstrom, Montana, he received a phone call from the above-ground guard post at the main gate to the complex. It was the NCO in charge of security. In a panic stricken voice the sergeant told Salas that there was a, 'Glowing red,' saucer shaped craft hovering just outside the main entrance. 'It's just sitting there...what do we do?' Salas told him to hang on while he went to inform the base commander: Lt. Fred Meiwald. It was as he spoke to his CO that the first alarm sounded. Both men looked across to a panel of annunciator lights: that indicated the status of the missiles under their control, to see that one of these was now off-line. As the alarm continued to sound another soon followed. Then two more missiles went down simultaneously. It wasn't long before all ten missiles at the base had been rendered 'inoperable'. Twenty-four hours would pass before maintenance crews could bring the missiles back on-line. In the aftermath of the incident Salas discovered that the same fate had: on that very same night, befallen another Minuteman base located 20 miles away from Malstrom. UFOs were reported in the vicinity – and another ten missiles were then 'taken off-line.' These events occurred at the height of the cold war so it should come as no surprise that nothing was known about them - outside of the small circle of witnesses and the officers that 'debriefed' them - at the time. This was, after all, the era of 'deterrence' and 'mutually assured destruction,' - and neither side was going to communicate to the other that their nuclear capability had been compromised. Since Salas stepped forward in 2001, more people: present at the bases on the night of 16 March 1967, have also come forward to corroborate his story. There has, also, been other cases involving UFOs and 'interference' with nuclear weapons technology. These include the Rendelsham Forest incident from 1980. Here UFOs were witnessed over-flying the US Air Force installations at RAF Bentwaters and Woodbridge and shooting 'beams of light' down into bunkers that contained nuclear warheads. Similar tales are also now emerging from Russia, mainly centered on a secret facility at Kapustin Yar: Russia's 'Area 51'. One of these even relates how a UFO appears to have 'initiated' a launch sequence count-down. Luckily – for us – the sequence terminated when the UFO left the area. And it doesn't end there. In his book, 'UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites,' author and researcher Robert Hastings presents us with a history of this phenomenon that stretches from as far back as 1948, to as recently as 2003. When researching this work the author interviewed 120 eyewitnesses and collated together declassified documents from many different official sources. This is serious evidence presented in a book that addresses an extremely serious issue. Evidence enough for us to conclude that the extraterrestrials themselves are very, very serious - and persistent - about their interest in our weapons of mass destruction. So now ask yourself: 'What are our visitors trying to communicate to us by persisting with this pattern of behavior?' Think about it. They are temporarily disabling these weapons. They are not destroying them altogether. And they are doing this repeatedly in order to draw our attention to the fact that they are, indeed, doing it. There is only one conclusion that can be drawn here. The extraterrestrials are asking us a question, they are offering us a way out of the nuclear nightmare. They are clearly telling us that if we send them an unequivocal indication that we desire to be free of all weapons of mass destruction, then they will oblige us by destroying – or otherwise rendering useless – the weapons currently held in stockpiles around the world. I would now ask the reader to examine their conscience. How can we not send ET that indication? We owe it to ourselves. We owe it to our children and grandchildren. We owe it to the future viability of all life on Planet Earth. You and I both know that our governments will not do anything to end the madness of WMDs and war. Quite the contrary. They are currently engaged in preparing us for war: first against Syria, and then Iran. They are doing all this at the behest of the banks and corporations. You should also note that those responsible for starting this war will survive it. Even if this war leads to a full-blown nuclear exchange, the warmongers will be safely cocooned underground in their bomb shelters: built with your tax money. So they will survive and millions of us – our sons and daughters, grandparents and grandchildren, brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles – will die. But this war need never happen. We have been given an option: by our visitors from across the Cosmos, that – should we choose to exercise it – could free us from the nightmare and put an end to war forevermore. Well, are you ready to exercise that option? If you are - this is what you need to do. Visit Change.org. In the 'Search petitions' box type: 'End the Madness'. Hit the search button. This will take you to the page featuring my petition. My petition calls upon, 'All intelligent entities of goodwill, including the entire human race, to help us achieve our desire to rid our world of all weapons of mass destruction and put an end to war'. Next, fill in the required fields and electronically sign this petition. That's it. The whole process should take you about five minutes. Alternatively, you can hit this link and save yourself some time: http://www.change.org/petitions/end-the-madness?utm_campaign=petition_created_email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=guides Now, if I am not mistaken you – the reader – will have a couple of questions for me at this point.
You should also be aware that this issue is becoming time critical. ET – I believe – will shortly make his presence here on Planet Earth so obvious that the reality of alien visitation will become undeniable. He will do this by re-staging an event that he first staged a century ago on the 9 February 1913. Artist: Gustave Hahn's, impression of the Great Canadian Meteor Procession of 1913. Despite the title given this event we are probably looking at – what was then and will be again – a world-wide phenomenon. This time around, though, the event will be captured on digital video by millions of people. These objects will be clearly seen to perform manoeuvres that meteors cannot. This is because they aren't meteors. I present my evidence – to back up this claim – here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IElpvqKMB3Y So it is now time to seize the day. People are soon to learn that everything that they have been told – everything that they believe they know – is a lie. Politics, economics, science and religion are all about to be shaken to their very core. Listen to me very carefully. Our time has come. Remember the children of Ruwa? That alien didn't land on the Whitehouse lawn and ask to speak to the President of the United States. He doesn't want to hear from the President of the United States. He wants to hear from you. Further reasons why you should sign my petition. By signing you will be sending a clear message – to the warmongers – that you are not willing to fight in, or condone, a war that only serves the interests of a select few. You will also be sending a clear message – to ET – that you are a mature, responsible adult who is committed to peace and doesn't present a threat to anyone of any race or creed: whether of extraterrestrial origin or otherwise. Finally, there is also something else that you should consider. Imagine millions of people, from all over the world, all calling out for the same thing: PEACE! When all those people finally understand that they can speak as one - they will realise that they can act as one. They will realise that we are not enemies, and they will stop listening to the politicians that lie – and connive with the banks and corporations – to convince them otherwise. Such a development: the world rising and speaking as one, would – of course – make headline news. It would become the hottest topic discussed on the TV and radio. TV and radio channels broadcast programs using electromagnetic radiation. And that radiation isn't confined to the circles of the world. It propagates outward: into the immensity of the Cosmos, at the speed of light. So ask yourself one last question: who is out there, right now, monitoring our broadcasts? You got it, ET will hear us. He will hear our response to his question and he will react. Now please sign my petition. And I promise you – you will believe. Peace, Love & Respect peter dunn Addendum
This article is available: in pdf format, for download. If the reader would like to help me free our world of all weapons of mass destruction, and put an end to war, please forward this article: as an attachment to an email, to your friends. Download PDF. Many thanks. pd War is coming. Every day the news – especially from the Middle East – just keeps getting more and more ominous. The main flashpoint - at the moment – is, of course, Syria. Here we have a situation that appears to defy any kind of logic; with the West arming and supporting extremist elements that include Salafists: whose avowed aim is to establish an Islamic world caliphate, and Al Qaeda. Both of these groups are sworn enemies of the West and Israel. So the question we need to ask is: why are our governments supporting them? Are those: from within our political elites, that frame foreign policy toward the Middle East totally insane? If these extremist groups succeed in bringing down the Assad regime they will then go on to slaughter every Jew and Syrian Christian that they can lay their hands on. And, what is more, the western intelligence services are acutely aware of the fact that this a very real possibility. So where is the logic here? For this to make any sense there has to be people – amongst the elites – that actually want all this to happen. And – as horrific as this might seem to some – this is, indeed, the case. Now anyone that knows anything about the situation in Syria – and the wider Middle East - understands that the stated reason behind the West's involvement: to replace the Assad dictatorship with democracy, is a cynically blatant lie. A more credible reason for the involvement is the isolation of Syria's main ally in the region: Iran, in preparation for an invasion of that country and the seizure of it's oil and natural gas reserves. But is that all there is to it? As bad a scenario as this seems, there could well be a much darker – hidden - motivation at work here. Consider this: to wage war against a country in order to seize control of it's natural resources is an understandable – although morally reprehensible – proposition. Waging war is simply 'the means' to 'an end': that being the seizure of Iran's riches. But what if this wasn't the case? What if war was the 'end' in itself? So – bearing in mind that we could be looking at a 'war for war's sake' master plan here – contemplate, once again, the likely consequences of the West's support for murderous Islamic extremism in Syria: should the extremists win. The murder of millions of Syrian Christians. Now how would the – mainly Christian - populations of the Western World react to such a situation? They would call out for war. This is the plan. Please try this: search out Christian groups on Facebook. Read what people are saying about Islam. You will come across certain characters that repeatedly post comments that demonize Muslims. At the moment Israeli sponsored posters are appearing throughout New York's subway system that refer, indirectly, to Muslims as savages. The graffiti that Jewish children are scrawling on the walls in Hebron reads, 'Gas the Arabs'. Anti Islamic propaganda appears – every day – in the privately owned western press and media. You are being taught to hate. You are being taught to fear. There is a massive campaign underway to generate religious hatred between the world's Jews and Christians on one side, and the Muslims on the other. On the Islamic side of this demonic equation you have the Saudi Arabian dictatorship: a supposed ally of the West, funding the Salafist and Al Qaeda extremists that will - by their actions in Syria - trigger a religious war that will surpass all previous conflicts in the extent of it's lethality and barbaric cruelty. We are looking at the destabilization of the entire world. We are looking at a war that will see every type of weapon: nuclear, biological, chemical and conventional, being deployed against helpless civilian populations. This war will have no frontiers. The races and religions are commingled together all around the globe. As soon as this madness starts martial law will be declared across America and Europe, and foreign nationals – along with those whom worship the wrong version of god – will be imprisoned in concentration camps. Any person that opposes this insanity will be deemed a traitor and also incarcerated. Once declared, martial law will never be rescinded because the power – over our lives – that it gives to the rich and powerful: those that are spending millions of dollars to promote this war, will never be surrendered. This war will deliver: into the hands of the rich, the 1%, the power of life and death, and they will rule over us like the megalomaniac Roman emperors of old. Abject enslavement, atrocity piling up – like corpses - on top of atrocity, and death on an unparallelled scale. Is this what you want for your world? We can stop this. If we – the people of Planet Earth – can stand together, and speak in unison, we can put an end to this madness. We must do this now. We must tell the greedy bastard warmongers that we will not kill each other on their behalf: for their gain. We must warn them that there will be a reckoning - and that they will be called to account for their crimes against us. Without our compliance, there can be no war. It is time to stand and up and speak. It is is time to send that message. Here's one way in which that message can be sent. Go to Change.org and sign my petition: 'End the Madness'. This calls for the removal of all weapons of mass destruction from our world and an end to war. The petition is addressed to the entire human race and – in a perfect world – is open to be signed by the entire human race. This will only take a few moments of your precious time. Please click on the link banner. You could also copy this link and email it to your friends. Please ask your friends to do the same and email it on to others.
http://www.change.org/petitions/end-the-madness?utm_campaign=petition_created_email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=guides If: by reading this article/blog post, you have been moved to act – then please share it. I would also ask you to understand that if we: the people, and the true inheritors of Planet Earth, can stand as one and do this together – we can achieve anything. Now get up off your knees and fight. Peace and love to you all. peter dunn Breaking news.
YouTube user: danielofdoriaa, today uploaded a short piece of film shot by one of the cameras aboard the international space station. This footage clearly shows a massive object - immediately above the Earth's atmosphere - that appears to be deploying smaller objects (orbs). The footage can be seen here: http://youtu.be/8nht2qydhD4 Personally, I believe that these objects are appearing in the Solar System for a purpose. That being, to intercede: on our behalf, and prevent the Solar Bombardment - that is, at present, building to a climax - from destroying all life on Planet Earth. They: those that build and pilot these objects, might have even done this before. I set out my argument for this in an article that I published on UFO Digest. It can be read by following this link: http://www.ufodigest.com/article/intervention-return-gods Now please ask yourself a question: will extraterrestrial entities do this for us if we remain hell-bent on destroying ourselves in a nuclear war? The answer to this cannot be anything other than NO! To qualify for their help we have to demonstrate to our extraterrestrial visitors that we are prepared to renounce all weapons of mass destruction. By we I mean you and I: all of us, as individuals. If you - as an individual - want to send that message: that you personally reject all weapons of mass destruction, to both our extraterrestrial visitors and the rest of humanity, please follow the link below and sign my petition, End the Madness. http://www.change.org/petitions/end-the-madness?utm_campaign=petition_created_email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=guides Please note that my petition is supported by both: Astronaut Story Musgrave, and Mindscape Magazine. Check it out here: http://mindscapemagazine.com Regards peter dunn |
Authorpeterxdunn Archives
May 2018
Categories
All
|