Every picture tells a story – right? Well, maybe, once-upon-a-time. Nowadays a picture can tell several stories. With modern technology/software the story a picture tells can be modified, or even changed out of all recognition, mid-narrative: as the tale itself unfolds. And this is most certainly true of the events in Boston: on the occasion of the marathon staged there on April 15.
We have all seen the plethora of images captured by cameras and camcorders at the marathon. And we have all read/heard the 'official' story of what those images depict. But – when we examine those pictures closely – does the story match up with what they are showing us? Or has any of the images been modified to tell us a different story: a different version of the events that actually unfolded on the day?
Let's examine some of those images.
Our first image shows suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev leaving the scene of the Boston bombing after planting a pressure cooker bomb hidden in a black backpack: according to the 'official' story of course. We can tell that this image was taken after the bombs exploded on Boylston Street because we have panicking people running down the road and Dzhokhar doesn't appear to have his backpack with him. Hmmm.
Now there has been a lot of people commenting online about this image. They point out that Dzhokhar's left arm is out-of-proportion to the rest of his body. They further argue that this indicates that the arm has been 'photoshopped' – enlarged - to disguise the fact that Dzhokhar is still in possession of the backpack that he allegedly left at the scene of the atrocity. OK.
Let's examine this claim.
Here is that same picture again.
Please note that I have adjusted the contrast of this image to give us a better view of Dzhokhar's left arm against the dark background. In all other respects (proportion ETC) it is exactly the same as the first image.
Now that we can see it more clearly that arm does seem a little over-large, wouldn't you say?
But we don't have to leave it there: making guesstimates and arguing over our own individual estimations. With digital images we can do something more constructive.
Here I've superimposed two lines onto the image. One (the cyan line) running down from Dzhokhar's shoulder to his elbow. And the other (the yellow line) running from his elbow to the ends (approximately) of his fingers.
So – taken together – these two lines approximate the length of Dzhokhar's left arm in proportion to the rest of his body as depicted in this picture. Right?
Now let's see what these lines – representing the length of that left arm - look like when turned: end-to-end, into a vertical position.
Well. According to what we are looking at here, Dzhokhar's left arm is – indeed - way out of proportion to the rest of his body. The tips of his fingers should be able to reach down no lower than mid-thigh; here they appear to be able to reach down to at least the level of his knees.
Check out this anatomical diagram for comparison.
It would appear, then, that this image of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been 'photoshopped' to disguise the fact that he left the scene of the Boston bombing with his backpack. That would mean that he didn't plant a bomb: that he is an innocent man.
It would also mean that the events at Boston constituted a false flag operation.
Then let's have a look at some more images.
This is the – now famous – 'floating leg' image. So called because it shows a leg and foot (arrowed) that doesn't appear to belong to anyone.
However – despite this proving that this image has indeed been 'photoshopped' – it isn't why I'm using it. Here, I would - instead - like the reader to consider something else.
(NB – there is also another major photographic anomaly in this picture. See if you can spot it)
No, what I want the reader to do is compare the picture above - with the picture below.
This second picture was taken shortly after the first. (Check out where the guy in the orange shirt: with the collar turned up, and punisher logo cap is in both pictures.)
Now please look at the three people indicated. What are they doing? They are looking straight at the camera/person taking these pictures. They can clearly see the person taking these pictures. These three people know that they are having their picture taken.
Now consider Dzhokhar. Remember, he is on a mission: a secret terror mission, to plant a bomb at the Boston marathon. We know that this has to be a secret terror mission because we have been informed – by the authorities – that both he and his brother: Tamurlan, were planning further terrorist attacks. They wouldn't be able to carry out those further attacks if they botched this mission and got themselves arrested. So remaining incognito – disguising their presence – at the Boston event was of paramount importance. Yet here we see Dzhokhar in plain view. Not only that – Dzhokhar must also be able to see the person that is taking his picture. He knows he is being photographed. And yet he makes no attempt to prevent this evidence: of his presence at the event, from being gathered. And he does this at least twice. Could this be because he believes that he has nothing to hide?
We must also – here – consider the person taking these pictures. What can we deduce about this guy? First of all it isn't hard – when looking at these two images – to figure out that the person taking them has to be stood in the road: not on the sidewalk. At Boston all the spectators (general public) were confined to standing behind barriers on the pavement/sidewalk. This guy isn't – therefore we can safely assume that this guy has to be a badge wearing official of some kind. (Again, one has to wonder about Dzhokhar's motives when he allowed this person to photograph him without attempting to hide himself.)
The next thing to consider is: what – or who – is the subject of the photographs that this guy is taking? Is this guy just taking general images of the marathon: merely recording the event? Or has he a specific target: a person-of-interest, that he wants to photograph?
Here I have placed 'cross hairs' over the center of both images. These enable us to deduce that Dzhokhar occupies a central position in both photographs: which were – remember – taken a moment or so apart (the time it took the guy in the orange shirt to get from where he is in the first picture to where is in the second). It would appear – then – that Dzhokhar : along with his brother Tamurlan (partially hidden to the left of Dzhokhar in the second image) is the subject of these photographs. This does mean – of course – that the Tsarnaev brothers were 'persons-of-interest' to the guy taking these images before those two 'bombs' detonated on Boylston Street. This would bear out the claims: made by the mother of the suspects, that the FBI had an ongoing relationship (were in contact with) Tamurlan in the years preceding the Boston incident.
There is simply no getting away from it my friends. What we witnessed in Boston was a staged event. A false flag operation.
That is what happened. The question we need to answer now is why it happened.
I would like, now, to present how some people reacted to this incident: by showing you the views they expressed in the aftermath.
All of the following comments were posted to LiveLeak.com.
'i want the west to declare open season on all Muslim immigrants that have beards'
'burn the cunt alive' (this was actually said of the suspect's mother).
'It is what we(the free thinkers) have been saying for the last few years. "Islam is Evil".'
'It's going to be hell for Muslims in Boston, and I don't give one flying fuck. I hope the sentiment grows in fact.'
'I never thought I could detest a religion, or one's beliefs in general. But enough is enough. Get the fuck out of western civilization, there's no place for you here.'
'....... a very sad moment in our history...........brought to you by islam.............'
'If only one percent of muslims are extremists, that is more than the complete size of our US military. Understand people what we are up against.'
'We need protection they need to ban Islam A religion that condones death of innocent people shouldn't be allowed'
'Something has to be done to fight Islam cancer of the earth'
'the drones will speak the language of peace'
These comments are fairly typical. You will find similar views expressed: on websites that feature forums and message boards discussing the Boston incident, all over the web.
The truly sad thing here is, this is exactly what those that planned and executed the Boston false flag operation were after. Their aim was - and is - to inculcate hatred of Islam in the collective psyche of the Christian west. To a large extent – they seem to have succeeded. They have convinced the people that hold these views that all Muslims are their enemies.
And – more ominously still – it doesn't end there. There is also a flip side to all of this. The real plotters behind Boston are not only actively spreading hatred of Islam. They are also spreading hatred of Christianity amongst the Muslim populations of the east.
This is how they are doing it. They are using these.
To do this:
I could go on.
So what is the point of all this death and mayhem? Why – to create more death and mayhem of course. For out of death and mayhem comes that which the rich and powerful seek above all else: pure profit.
The rich and powerful are plotting out our collective future. They are planning for us to go to war: the Christian west versus the Muslim east. They will amass enormous profits from this conflict by lending the participating nations the money: to pay for the weapons, which we will then use to kill one another. And the really sickening thing is that the banks do not have the money in the first place. They will only 'create' the money: out of thin-air, once we have agreed to owe it them. In other words – we will be fighting and dying for precisely nothing.
Please be aware that there isn't much time left – now – before the rich and powerful put their plans for us into action. All that's holding them back is the fact that two of the biggest players in the coming conflict: Syria and Iran, are not yet integrated into the enslavement-through-debt system of control by the global banking cartel. Neither of these two countries owe the IMF a dime. In order for the cartel to maximize the profits from the coming war this has to change. This is why Syria, followed by Iran, are going to be attacked. Once these two are defeated the stage will be set for the main event. A perpetual war without frontiers. A war that will see us all totally subjugated: powerless, under martial law. A war designed to depopulate Planet Earth.
You now need to ask yourself the most important question that you'll ever be asked: do you want this war? Are you prepared to go along with this insanity?
If you are not prepared to condone this madness then you need to register your opposition to this war right now. Please stand up and tell the entire world that you reject all wars and weapons of mass destruction.
You can do this by signing my petition hosted on Change.org. It is called 'End the Madness'.
Please use this link:
I know that signing my petition only constitutes one small step along the road to peace. But we all need to take that first step. And we all need to take it together.
We are one. No more war.
Peace, Love & Respect