The title graphic (above) uses a segment taken from a much larger image captured by the Mars Rover: Curiosity, on Sol 01547 (instrument: NavCam Right B).
Now, the whole purpose for this exercise: I have identified three anomalous objects in this image that we need to take a closer look at.
Anomaly One: "The Brick".
This object appears to consist of three rectangular surfaces conjoined at right angles to one another. What can I say – it's a brick.
Anomaly Two: "The Shark's Fin".
Here we seem to be looking at a slab, with a curving upper surface, from which projects a shark's fin shaped extension. Please compare the relatively smooth lines of this object, with the rough, irregular surfaces of the surrounding rocks. It looks totally (dare I say it) alien in this environment.
Anomaly Three: "The Bowl".
With this, half buried in the Martian soil, object we seem to be looking at something that once possessed circularity, but has been damaged at some point. Look carefully at the dark, shadowed area. There also appears to be evidence of convexity behind this dark area. This, to me, suggests that we are looking at a bowl shaped artifact here.
So let's look a little deeper.
The animated GIF below uses segments from two images captured by both Curiosity's Left and Right NavCams on Sol 01547.
At this point I would like you all to remember/bring to mind the "Face on Mars". NASA claims that this enigmatic feature only resembles a face when it is viewed from a certain angle. Please now look closely at the rear edge of our "Shark's Fin": indicated by the red arrow.
Here we are seeing the "Shark's Fin" in parallax: from two different angles. Despite the different viewing angles the elegant curve we see at the rear of the "Shark's Fin" remains an elegant curve. The curve remains because this is how it was made: to be a curve. Now we cannot know whether this object has been carved, moulded or machined. We cannot know how this artifact was manufactured – until we can get-up-close and inspect this object in minute detail.
Please now turn your attention to what is being indicated by the blue arrow. Here we are looking at the rim (which appears to be dented) of "The Bowl". Can you see how the appearance of the bright spot: directly below the blue arrow, changes as the angle from which we are viewing it changes? Are we looking at reflected sunlight here? Is this object made of metal?. Again, we cannot know anything for sure until we are afforded a much closer view of this object.
And this, my friends, is where you come in. Wouldn't you like to get-up-close-and-personal with these anomalies? The Curiosity Rover isn't that far away from the point at which it captured these images. It wouldn't be that difficult for NASA to have Curiosity back-track along it's line of travel and return to that spot. Once there it could then be sent over to our enigmatic trio and use all of it's analytical instrumentation to determine what they are.
My friends, if NASA could be persuaded to do this for us then we could finally have an answer to the biggest, single question facing mankind: Are we alone in the Universe?
This has got to be worth giving it a shot.
So this is what one of you – out there – has to do. One of you has got to start a petition demanding that NASA investigate the anomalous objects that appear in images caputured by Curiosity, on Sol 01547.
I would do this myself but I am way too busy promoting the Universal Peace Petition (check out the Universal Peace tab at the top of this page).
Now, where do I sign?
Many thanks to NASA JPL for making the images used here available.
The original Sol 01547 NavCam Right image can be viewed here:
The author of this work claims 'fair use': with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
All arguments made, and conclusions reached, in this article are solely those of the author and are not attributable – in anyway whatsoever – to NASA.
This article is available for download in PDF format.
Click the image above to obtain your free copy of the Made On Mars PDF.
Now don't worry my friends, I am not suggesting that UFOs show up and destroy the US capital. I am simply asking that they put in an appearance over Washington DC - like they did back in July 1952.
So why would I want to see the sky over Capitol Hill inundated with craft from other star systems? Because it is there: at the epicentre of the global alliance's military, economic and political power that an appearance by extraterrestrial star craft would have the greatest impact. If they appear there – then everything changes. The repercussions of such an event would be enormous – affecting us all as individuals – and collectively as members of the Human Race.
Back in 1952 the appearance of UFOs over what was then, and still is, the most heavily defended air space anywhere in the world, did cause quite a stir. The series of UFO sightings that constituted 'The Washington UFO flap of 1952' began on July 12, and extended until July 29. Among the tens of thousands of witnesses to this series of events were military and civilian radar operators – some of whom saw the UFOs on both their radar screens and with their naked eyes. These objects were not just radar glitches – they were real objects flying and hovering over the nation's capital. Even directly above the White House. When Sabre fighter jets were sent up to intercept these anomalous objects they flew off at tremendous speed – only to return once the jets had gone – proving that they were under the intelligent control of what could only have been extraterrestrial pilots. This was extraterrestrial visitation with a purpose.
But what would happen if they were to return? It would be different the next time around. This is because, these days, there are more than just Americans thronging the streets of Washington: there are also tourists from across Europe and Asia. And all of these are equipped with either cell phones or digital cameras – technology with which they can record everything. If the events of 1952 were to recur then an explosion of sensational images and multi-lingual witness testimony would reverberate across social media. And, as much as they might try, mainstream media could not ignore it either – forcing governments around the world to disclose everything they know about UFOs and extraterrestrials.
So the question now has to be: are extraterrestrials ever coming back to the skies over Washington DC? Well, I would put it to you, what if we were to ask them?
Believe it or not, there is a protocol that we could use to send ET an invitation. This protocol was devised by Dr Steven Greer, and it is employed by the members of his CE-5 (Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind: IE encounters with extraterrestrials initiated by humans)) Initiative to 'vector in' UFOs to a particular place at a certain time.
Now this protocol is quite controversial, as it involves telepathy. But what you need to bear in mind here is that there are developing technologies - right now, here on Earth – that use the power of thought to control simple computer programs and machines. In the near future these technologies will enable prosthetic limbs to be controlled directly from the brain. We also have compelling evidence that extraterrestrials communicate telepathically. Back in 1994, at Ruwa in Zimbabwe, two extraterrestrials delivered a terrifying message: concerning a future world consumed in a nuclear conflagration, to sixty two schoolchildren. All of the children described how the extraterrestrials spoke to them, 'With their eyes,'. Which is a pretty good way of describing telepathic communication without actually knowing what telepathy is.
Are you, then, willing to send ET a telepathic message and ask him to drop in on Washington and reveal his presence in way that makes the truth of extraterrestrial visitation undeniable? If we send that message, and extraterrestrials receive it, our world could change: from a war-torn, desease and death ravaged failed planet, to the paradise – free from poverty - that we all know it should be. Surely it has got to be worth giving it a shot. Please ask yourself: what will it cost you?
So let's give it a go.
It would help here if we could all agree on a single message to send out to the Universe. And, after giving it some thought, I decided that the (cyan lettering) text in the image below pretty much says what needs to be said:
Now you all know why I've chosen Washington for the re-enactment of the 1952 cosmic revelation. But what about the date and time (we do need to be specific about this)? July 4 is, of course, America's Independence Day. On that day many Americans will travel to the capital to join in the celebrations, and mingle with thousands of tourists from around the world. And what will all these people be doing at ten o'clock in the evening? They will all be looking skyward to see one of the biggest firework displays they will ever witness. But what else are they going to see in the skies over Washington?
That could depend on your good selves - my friends. If you learn to recite the Washington Mantra, and repeatedly think it, repeatedly say it out loud, and go on repeating it – in groups or on your own – then those human visitors to Washington DC: on July 4, 2017 could be joined by our brothers and sisters from the stars.
Wouldn't you like to be there when that happens – I know I would.
WE ARE ONE
The author of this work claims fair use: with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
What is the big attraction: in Norway's Hessdalen Valley, for our extraterrestrial visitor's from the stars? Why do their craft keep showing up in the skies over the valley?
The history of UFO activity in the Hessdalen Valley goes back over a century – and it continues to this day. In fact - if you've never seen a UFO – by far the best way to witness your first would be for you to monitor the live cam streams that the Project Hessdalen Team have set up there.
You can check out the live streams here:
And the image you see here...
...was captured by Cal Priest: of the CE5 Southern Tasmania Group on Facebook, from one of those live cams.
This is real – it is happening right now.
So what are extraterrestrials up to in the Hessdalen Valley? I think the answer to this is pretty straightforward. They have been visiting this locality for over a century and in all that time not a single person has been abducted, probed, given birth to a hybrid or messed about with in any way. The locals have even been followed by UFOs in their cars, but none of them has ever come to any harm whatsoever.
Contrast this with what you hear from the United States: malevolent alien greys abducting and torturing people, an underground war against aliens being fought in New Mexico, women having their hybrid babies stolen from their wombs, a secret space war/program underway in our Solar System and human slaves mining minerals on the Moon (where else) for a consortium of extraterrestrials and members of the military industrial complex. Wow! OMG – what a load of crap.
Which would you rather believe?
No my friends, the reality of extraterrestrial visitation might seem 'out-of-this-world', but the truth is still quite mundane. Extraterrestrials come in peace. They have proven this, and continue to prove it, by their actions in the Hessdalen Valley: where they simply show up and declare – by just being there – "We are here".
This is the message that extraterrestrials are sending us – and will continue to send us - with their actions in the Hessdalen Valley.
And this is a message that requires a response – because extraterrestrials are patiently waiting for us to answer.
They bring a message of peace and we must answer them with peace. This is the only way in which we can move forward and establish mutually beneficial contact between humanity and extraterrestrial civilizations.
My friends, Hessdalen is calling – please answer the call – and sign the Universal Peace Petition:
The Universal Peace Petition Group on Facebook:
Some decidedly weird objects are showing up in the images sent back to Earth by NASA's Curiosity Rover.
And what I am going to show you here has got to be the weirdest so far.
Check it out:
The individual frames in this slide show were sourced from a composite (mosaic) Martian panorama featured on NASA's JPL/CalTech website.
You can view the panorama here:
Now some viewing these images will claim that we are looking at dirt on the camera housing – nothing more – but if that were the case then this 'anomaly' should appear at the same spot within each image's square frame. But as you can see...
...this clearly isn't the case. The object is moving around within the frame which precludes it from being either accumulated dirt or a digital image artefact.
And this is confirmed by the fact that the object appears in some frames but not in others.
The Curiosity Rover shoots panoramic views in pretty much the same way you would when using your digital camera in panorama mode: you take a picture, move the camera, take another picture, move the camera and so on.
This next sequence uses a series of frames that were shot 'in sequence' by Curiosity's telephoto Mastcam.
(This sequence features four frames: two from the left of the frame with our 'object', and one from the right.)
This object appears thirteen times (?) in the original NASA panorama. So what are we looking at here? Thirteen individual objects or a single object that zipped around and photo-bombed thirteen seperate frames as Curiosity's Mastcam slowly panned – both horizontally and vertically – as it compiled this panoramic image?
I think the latter scenario to be the most likely.
And I have a good reason for thinking this.
The individual frames that make up the panorama were shot during Curiosity's two month (October/November, 2012) stop over at a position that the guys at NASA dubbed the 'Rocknest'. That was almost four years ago now.
And our UFO hasn't gone away. It's still out there shadowing Curiosity (Opportunity probably has a 'shadow' drone following it too) as it trundles across the Martian landscape.
This image was captured just a few days ago using the Powellware mobile phone application, which lets you view the latest images from the Mars Rovers in near 'real-time'. The person that captured it states that the object you see here was actually visibly moving when this single frame was downloaded using the application.
It would appear that our Martian probes are – themselves – being probed. NASA knows this, and now you do too.
So I would like to ask you: "What are you going to do about it?"
There are actions you could take that would help move Mankind's developing relationship with our Extraterrestrial Visitors to whole new level. And the first action, I would respectfully suggest, is that you to join The Universal Peace Petition Group on Facebook.
Here's the link to The Universal Peace Petition Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/489325787932211/ hope to see you there soon.
I hope to see you there soon.
I hope to see you there soon.
The author of this work claim's 'fair use': with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
The author of this work is not claiming, in any way, that NASA – in any way – agrees with, supports, or in any way condones any of the conclusions reached in this article.
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS
Many thanks to NASA/JPL-Caltech for making this material available.
Was Mars once home to an advanced civilization? And is the evidence: to support such a sensational theory, now slowly being revealed?
I'm going to show you a single, bona fide NASA image; and then we're going to zoom right in on four areas within it: four areas that could reveal a startling truth.
What do you think this is?
What does it look like to you?
Let's sharpen the image up a little – and narrow our focus.
Look at this object's rightmost extremity – where the arrow is pointing. Can you see how the sunlight (judging from the shadows the sun appears to have been almost overhead, only slightly off to one side, when this picture was taken) penetrates under it? This tells us that, at this end, the object is standing clear of the ground. It appears to be a tube attached to a long, square section support structure. I can even see evidence that this tube was once encased in some form of cladding that has been smashed, and has fallen away to reveal the straight (look along the upper edge of the object) line of the tube within. Are we looking at a hot water pipe here (sorry – I just HAD to ask)?
Here we appear to be looking at some kind of semi-circular structure that shows clear evidence that it was constructed using bricks or blocks of stone. Look at where the red arrow is pointing. Do you see the 'stepped' configuration of this semi-circular wall? Could erosion, by wind-blown sand, be responsible for this configuration?
Also, If you look closely at the middle of the shadowed area within the semi-circle, you will even see what might be a door.
What we could seriously do with here is some indication of the scale of the objects we're looking at. (A little input from NASA would be helpful in this respect – although I will not be holding my breath.)
Wow – a truncated step pyramid – you gotta be kidding me.
But the fact is, it's right there my friends, on the Martian surface.
Go check it out for yourselves using the image url provided.
And it gets even more bizarre, look at where the red arrow is pointing.
Is that some kind of embossed design, a symbol perhaps, carved out near the apex of this mysterious structure?
With this image I've isolated the 'Martian Symbol' and cranked up the contrast to the maxx.
And here the mystery deepens, as weird this petroglyph design is – given it's location – things could get even weirder: because it's vaguely familiar, I think I've seen it before. Maybe a crop circle, or cave painting I've seen somewhere. If you've got access to a database of such images, please start checking and post a link in the comments below if you find anything.
Well there had to be one didn't there.
A carved stone face complete with two eyes (notice the prominent eyebrow on the right – your left), a nose (with nostrils) and a gaping mouth.
This face seems to have served as some kind of architectural feature/adornment, as it's squared off at the back, perhaps it was designed to project from a wall.
Nor is it the first carved face/head that we've seen on the Red Planet.
So my friends, what do you reckon. Does this article – and the images featured herein – prove: conclusively, that Mars was once home to an advanced civilization?
And if it was, what happened to them? Did they destroy themselves? Or did they just leave and go somewhere else?
Maybe they came here. Maybe we are all Martians.
Now, before I sign off, I have a favour to ask of you my friend. Please use the link below to access and download the AlienPeace2 one page pdf.
Please read this pdf very carefully. It is offering you an option – an option to join the Global Campaign for Peace on Earth and Across the Cosmos. This campaign will never ask you for any money. All it requires you to do is sign the Universal Peace Petition and then do what you can to get others to do the same. That's it. So, my friend, please exercise that option and join with others striving to bring positive change to our world – and beyond.
The author of this work is not, in any way, claiming that NASA supports, agrees with or condones any of the claims or conclusions set out in this article.
Many thanks to NASA for making the material/images - without which this article could not have been written - available.
My Friends, if you want to see World Peace, and if you want your children to have a future worth living, then you are going to need to get proactive.
World Peace just isn't going to happen without your input.
So don't leave it to others. Shoulder your responsibilities and join the Global Campaign for Peace on Earth and Across the Cosmos.
My Friends, the Universal Peace Petition now has a support group on Facebook.
Please join this group and start pro-actively campaigning for peace in the company of like minded people.
You will find the group here:
And here's something that you can do for Universal Peace right now:
Please check out this image:
This is a jpeg version of a one page pdf document - please click on the picture to open the AlienPeace2 pdf. (It will open in a new window.)
Now you can use the link provided to sign The Universal Peace Petition straight away.
And you can also use Adobe's Save Function to download a copy of the document to your computer. After saving the document you can really start pushing for Universal Peace by attaching it to emails and sending it to your friends and family.
Know this: together we can change our World. WE ARE GOING TO CHANGE OUR WORLD.
SO PLEASE GET PROACTIVE FOR PEACE.
Under UK law treason is defined to be 'the undermining of parliamentary democracy by extra-parliamentary means'.
Ergo, the TransatlanticTrade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), if written into European law and then ratified by national legislatures, will constitute the legalization of treason. This is because the TTIP provides for the setting up of secret courts wherein democratically elected governments can be prosecuted: by the banks and corporations, for enacting laws that the banks and corporations deem detrimental to their interests. Our governments - if found guilty by this secret court system - will then be forced to pay huge fines and also amend - or even repeal altogether - the offending legislation. Put simply the banks and corporations are to be given: under the auspices of the TTIP, the legal right to undermine parliamentary democracy by extra-parliamentary means. Treason is going to be made legal - but only when it is perpetrated by the mega-rich.
Futhermore, we have just celebrated Victory in Europe Day - a day of remembrance for the millions of soldiers and civilians that died in the 1939-1945 war to defeat the spread of fascism across Europe and the wider world.
My friends, if we allow the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - and the Transpacific Partnership - to become law we will have betrayed the sacrifices of all those that fought and died in the Second World War. Their sacrifice will have been for nothing. Fascism wins.
My friends, it's time we buried the TTIP.
If you wish to contact your MEP about this matter please use this link provided by the campaign group 38degrees:
Our scientists: and this includes the most eminent among them, are telling us that mankind is not alone in the Cosmos.
(Source for Professor Hawking's quote: http://journalofcosmology.com/Aliens100.html)
And you will already, no doubt, be aware of where I stand on the UFO/extraterrestrial visitation issue: I know for a fact that aliens are visiting Planet Earth.
Most scientists – on the other hand – would disagree with my position. They argue that the immense distances between star systems precludes us from ever being visited by other, advanced civilizations.
The thing is though, our scientists haven't, themselves, ruled out the possibility that – at some point in the (not too distant) future – they will, themselves, develop the technology that will take mankind to the stars.
Please check out these links:
Okay, so science doesn't exclude the possibility that mankind will – eventually - possess the technology that will enable us to travel between star systems. And the timescale over which we will – according to the scientists – develop this capability is a matter of just a couple of centuries: not much time at all in the overall scheme of things.
So what are we to make of this? Are we expected to believe that aliens cannot, ever, come here; but one day we will be able to go there. This all sounds a little contradictory don't you think?
And the contradictions become positively bizarre when other factors are taken into account. What we need to bear in mind here is that the Milky Way Galaxy* is thought to be 13.6 billion years old - whilst our Solar System has only been around for a paltry 3.5 billion years. (Not to mention that mankind only emerged on Planet Earth a mere 200,000 years ago.) Aliens could, then, be billions of years older than mankind and possess billions more years worth of technological advancement over and above anything possessed by us. So – we have to ask – for how long has ET been beavering away developing star drive technology?
(* There's also more galaxies out there – some older than the Milky Way – than we can count.)
Consequently, when these facts are taken into consideration, where does it leave the stone cold certainty with which our scientists assert that ET could never make the journey? I would argue: in tatters. Further to this, I would also argue that they have no right to make such sweeping assertions. For even they would admit that the absence of evidence proves nothing either way. The most that they could, in truth, assert is that – as individuals – they haven't seen any evidence so would be disinclined to think that Planet Earth was being visited by extraterrestrial lifeforms. In other words, they are entitled to express an individual opinion: nothing more. So when they present us with an opinion masquerading as scientific fact; and when they use their academically polished gravitas to give weight to this 'fact', they are doing us: and the search for truth, a calculated disservice.
Luckily, for those seeking the truth however, not all scientists see things the same way.
(Source for Dr Michio Kaku's quote: http://mkaku.org/home/articles/the-physics-of-interstellar-travel/ )
Once you've read Dr Kaku's article you will understand that he believes star travel to be entirely feasible (although difficult to achieve), and doesn't rule out that Planet Earth is, indeed, being visited by extraterrestrials/UFOs. (To be clear: nor has he ever, to my knowledge, stated that we are being visited by them either.)
Dr Kaku's article also sets out categories of UFO sighting which he deems "harder to dismiss". Among these are sightings that involve multiple witnesses:
Here's an example:
And sightings reported by expert: IE military, witnesses. Please watch:
You need to watch both of these movies. You need to understand that extraterrestrials are involving themselves in human affairs and appear to be expressing concern about the direction in which our technology is taking us. Their primary concern would seem, understandably, to be with our nuclear weapons technology.
They are not – either – alone in their concerns.
We also have the Atomic Scientists: those responsible for setting the Doomsday Clock, who are telling us that we are now closer to the Dawn of Doomsday than we have ever been before. They are saying that we have only three minutes left. Then it all ends – mankind will erase himself from the cosmological time-line – and it will be like we never existed at all. For nobody will be left to remember us.
My Friends, we need to listen to what we are being told: by both the Atomic Scientists and our brothers and sisters from the stars.
So what's it to be? Do we choose survival are do we cast ourselves into the abyss?
If you choose survival, if you choose Universal Peace, then please sign the Universal Peace Petition.
Please use this link:
If you choose the abyss – then it's high time you said your goodbyes.
Acknowledgments and links:
Many thanks to:
Professor Stephen Hawking
Dr Michio Kaku for their ongoing search for the truth (as they see it).
Image sources (with thanks):
Dr Michio Kaku:
The author of this work claims fair (non-commercial) use: with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
Question: when is a meteor not a meteor?
Answer: when it is seen to be performing manoeuvres that are impossible for a lump of inanimate rock to perform.
Please take a look at the picture below.
If you look carefully at this drawing - and study what some of the 'meteors' illustrated are shown to be doing – then compare this with the hard facts known about the behaviour of actual meteors; you will be forced to the conclusion that some of the objects depicted here cannot be meteors. They cannot be meteors because they are performing manoeuvres that lumps of inanimate rock cannot possibly perform.
Now, before we move on, I would ask you to pay close attention to the amount of detail shown in this image. Look at the clearly outlined shrubbery shown in the foreground. Make note of the expertly drawn reflections of the descending meteors in the waters of the lake to the right. I ask you to do this as I will be returning to this image (or another version of it to be more precise) at the end of this article.
I would also ask you to pay careful attention to the way in which the artist here (I'll be introducing him to you later ) has pictured the majority of the meteors. That is: behaving in typical meteoric fashion, following a curved parabola to earth.
We can now begin examining the anomalies. Please watch this slide show.
With this sequence I've isolated (with box-outs) two of the anomalous 'meteors' that you need to be focussing on. One is clearly shown executing a right angle turn manoeuvre – while the other appears to have changed direction completely - and decided to go back up, after swooping down low, just above the lake. (NB. Please note: there appears to be two 'meteors' performing this 'low swoop' - in coordination with each other - in the original image.
Now for the box-outs. You can see that I've picked out certain features with star bursts. These star bursts are intended to draw your attention to the fact that these 'meteors' possess both a 'head', and a 'tail'. Let me explain. Most meteors, or shooting stars, are mere specks of dust that come in from space and burn up with a flash – often in less than a second - as they hit the upper atmosphere. Others are much longer lived. These are rocks: of varying sizes, that penetrate much deeper into our atmosphere at high speed: typically 36,000 mph or faster. The friction caused by their passage through the air causes these rocks to heat up and glow. This friction also abrades the surface of the rock/meteor so that a glowing tail of hot meteoritic material/dust forms in its wake.
This is what you are looking at in the image above: meteors that all feature both a 'head' (the rock) and a 'tail'. I'm stressing this because there are those that would have you believe otherwise. Some people will tell you that the – apparent – right angle turn shown here: and both the 'U' shaped upswings, are the result of a meteor generated phenomenon known as a 'persistent train' being distorted by the wind.
OK. Let's have a look at this. So the anomalous shapes/tracks we see are the reult of wind distortion acting upon just three of the many meteor tracks shown. Really. What about the rest? Why aren't they all affected by the wind?
Now listen up. There probably are wind distorted 'persistent trains' featured in this drawing of the 1868 Leonid Meteor Storm. You will find them indicated by arrows in the sequence. These aren't clouds.
It's about time we took a closer look at these persistent trains – don't you think?
Now if you google the term: 'persistent trains', you will come across different interpretations, here's just a couple.
Persistent trains are the vaporized remains of the tiny meteoroid. The dust is blown around by upper level winds in Earth’s atmosphere.
The Free Dictionary
The luminous trail of ionized particles left by a meteor and visible to the naked eye for periods typically less than one second.
For something really technical (this is an actual research paper available for download) try this:
(NB. If you download and read this pdf you will find out that researchers sometimes fire sampling rockets into the tails of meteors to gather dust particles for analysis.)
But what does a persistent train actually look like?
Looks like a lightning strike doesn't it. Well, this is hardly surprising. Both lightning strikes and persistent trains are composed of highly energetic charged particles. Or, to put it another way, both are plasmas. And there's also another commonality shared by them: they can both be 'seen' on radar screens.
(NB. In some cases persistent trains have continued emitting VHF radio waves for over ten minutes: IE long after disappearing from view in the visible spectrum.)
The image above is actually the first in a series of sixteen captured by members of the International Meteor Organization (IMO) during an expedition to Mongolia in 1998.
Here's the complete series:
If you visit the webpage in question ( here's the link: http://www.imo.net/video/examples/example5 ) you will discover that the 16 images: which are sequential, illustrate the formation of a persistent train. Or do they? Something else you will discover on the International Meteor Organizations' website is that this sequence was shot with a video camera: so where's the movie? They do provide a link to an MP4 purportedly showing this sequence but the link didn't work (all l got is a 'page not found' message). In fact, most of the internal links on the IMO's site didn't work either. Try them, you might have better luck than me.
All is not, however, lost. I really wanted to view these 16 frames in the manner intended by the guy that filmed them. So I decided to indulge in a little re-animation. I hope you like the result.
(NB. The green screen indicates the end/start of the sequence.)
There seems to be a lot going on here doesn't there. Now when viewing this unusual event do you see what I see: structure, for instance? Do you see articulated cohesion, perhaps? This particular 'persistent train' does seem to 'hang-together': even if only briefly, as it develops - don't you think?
We need to take a closer look at this. Let's start breaking things down. This phenomenon appears to feature distinct sections that are joined together by two pivot points. So let's give these names for easy reference.
Okay. We have our sections and the pivot points that join them together.
Next we need to look at the way in which the different sections of our 'arm' move/articulate in relation to each other.
This next image illustrates the starting positions – and the directions in which they will begin to move - of the different sections.
(NB. Please note: when I'm using terminology such as: ascending, descending, up, down ETC – I'm refering to what we are seeing on screen – this mightn't, necessarily, equate with how the 'train' moved across [?] the sky.)
We now need to watch the sequence again.
What you need to watch for:
What then, are the red arrows showing us?
Let's deal with the arrow to the left of the screen first. Here we appear to be seeing an object that has become detached from the plasma structure, that tags along with it for a while as it moves downwards, and then becomes stationary as the train continues to descend. Weird or what?
Next we have the arrow on the right. Here it gets even weirder. This is picking out an object that blasts upward from the 'wrist' just as the rotating 'hand' has reached the perpendicular. What's more, it is doing this against the flow : in opposition to the motion of the structure as a whole. When first I saw this I was tempted to think that it might be a sampling/research rocket aimed at the train by scientists (or even a ground to air missile). But, given that this sequence was filmed in Mongolia – and no mention is made of a rocket by the IMO members who were there on the ground (scanning the sky with military grade image intensifying technology) – I discounted this theory. So the rapidly ascending object relates to this enigmatic plasma entity – not some outside force or agency.
Now the question – at this point - has to be: was either, or perhaps both, of the objects indicated: both of which qualify as UFOs in the absolute sense of the term, responsible for what we are witnessing here?
This may well be the case. UFOs have, after all, been associated with electromagnetic disturbances. They've shut down the electrical systems in cars for instance – and, incredibly, the targetting avionics of fighter aircraft as the pilot prepared to open fire on them. (There are witnesses to such things: people that have direct experience of these events. Check out Robert Salas' testimony covering the 1967 Malmstrom Airbase incident.) For myself, I would argue that UFOs exploit a polarized plasma field to enable them work their magic: such as appearing from nowhere and disappearing (I would say 'de-materializing') along with performing high-speed manoeuvres that defy the inertial laws of physics and jumping across vast, interstellar (maybe even inter-galactic) distances instantaneously.
If you would like to understand how they do this, how alien (space-ripping) technology works: please download and read this pdf:
(NB. Please note: this document also doubles-up as a Grand Unified Theory of Space and Time.)
To return to our plasma entity. The structure does – after a little while – begin to disperse: and I've no doubt that the wind would have had something to do with this. But were the effects of the wind solely responsible for the way in which this structure evolved over time: and the other weird phenomena associated with it? I don't think so. Nor, I suspect, do you.
There is also another reason why I believe that this, and related events aren't, necessarily, the result of rarely seen natural developments. If such occurrences were purely due to mundane, easily explicable happenstance – why, then, are steps being taken to hide them?
I'm now going to show you an instance of digital vandalism; the sole purpose of which is to hide the truth.
Remember this? (I'll forgive you if you don't.) This is, of course, another version of the picture that I used to introduce the subject matter of this article: malformed meteors doing things they really shouldn't. It's quite dark isn't it? If you were to come across this old lithographic print on, say, Wikipedia (from where I downloaded it) – would you pay it much attention? Would you take the time to really scrutinize it to try and work out what was going on? Maybe you would sit – shaking your head – wondering why an artist would even bother to produce such a murky image: an illustration that illustrates almost nothing.
But, enough of the rhetorical questions. You know what's going on here don't you. You know why this artists' impression of the 1868 Leonid meteor storm is so devoid of detail. But, before we start handing down judgement on this criminal misrepresentation, let's meet the artist responsible for the original: an artist whose stock-in-trade was his meticulous, even obsessive, attention to detail.
Trouvolet: a French national, emigrated to America in 1852 where he worked as an artist and illustrator. In 1872 he joined the staff of the Harvard College Observatory where he produced astronomical drawings that are now held in several collections across the US.
He is credited with the discovery of 'veiled' sun spots and was honoured, for his contributions in the astronomical field, by having a crater on the moon named after him. So, when it comes to the importance/ranking of luminaries in the history of astronomy, this guy is up there with the likes of Tycho Brahe.
None of this, however, mattered to the mean-minded, truth denying little shit that decided Trouvolet's diligent observations had revealed too much and needed – therefore - to be consigned to darkness..
To him I would say: :"The truth will not be denied. So go f<ck yourself".
Now an important note. Trouvolet's drawing: The November Meteors, was based on observations made of the Leonid Meteor Storm that lit up the sky on the night of November 13-14 1868. However, if you look up the annual arrival of the Leonids on google you will probably be told that the best time to see them: this year, will be on the night of 17-18 November. I would advise that you be ready on both nights. Remember, you aren't just looking out for meteors doing what meteors do. You are also looking out for: and hopefully recording, meteors doing stuff that they shouldn't.
My Friends, the next time plasmatic fire flames across the skies, it mightn't be over a remote region of Mongolia, it might be directly over your head. So be ready.
Acknowledgments and links:
Many thanks to the International Meteor Organization
The Leonid meteors' parent comet is thought to be Tempel Tuttle.
Read more here:
If you want to see a meteor exploding followed by wind dispersal of the results: go here:
The author of this work claims 'fair use': with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
I'm going to show you clear, irrefutable evidence that there is an ongoing conspiracy to cover-up the facts concerning UFOs and the extraterrestrial presence in our Solar System and skies.
I'm also going to show you that there are those that are prepared to move continents (metaphorically speaking) in order to falsify maps: specifically with regard to the time zone information conveyed by those maps, so as to hide the truth about past and current events.
Now let's take a look at the evidence.
Maps & Hard Facts.
You will, no doubt, be familiar with different kinds of maps. You will also be aware that most maps feature both horizontal lines: called lines of latitude – and vertical lines: called lines of longitude. It is with the latter: the lines of longitude (also known as meridians), that we will be concerning ourselves with here. Lines of longitude fulfill a very important function: they vertically divide maps of the world into twenty-four time zones that correspond to the twenty-four hour sidereal day. Back in the days before global positioning technology navigators: aboard ships at sea, used two clocks (one set to local time and the other to Greenwich Mean Time) to compute their longitudinal position – from east to west – relative to the Prime Meridian (which is set at zero degrees) that intersects the Royal Observatory at Greenwich ( in the UK).
The important thing to remember here is that time zones do not change. There might well be a localized or regional scheme at work in the place where you live, but these schemes: such as British Summer Time for instance, are introduced for economic/commercial reasons - or so that children are not packed off to school whilst it's still dark ETC. These schemes do not, in any way, affect global time zones that are demarcated by lines of longitude: these remain fixed.
Now we are going to be comparing maps as we go along – so we are going to need geographical points of reference: which are common to all the maps we will be looking at, in order to make accurate comparisons.
Furthermore, what you need to understand about these reference points is that we are only interested in their longitudinal position: which fixes the time zones in which they are located. Their latitudinal relationship can be safely ignored.
The geographical reference points that I have chosen for this exercise are:
We are now ready to start counting time zones.
(Please don't worry if you are a little perplexed right now. Everything will, I can assure you, become perfectly plain by the time you have reached the end of this article.)
Please count from where the Isthmus of Panama joins to South America, to the West coast of North Africa.
I've included this next, static, map so that there can be no misunderstanding on the time zone issue. The maps above and below both convey the same hard facts.
These days there isn't, really, any excuse why any maps should convey/contain inaccurate information: given the widely available technological tools with which we can all put maps together. I mean, anyone can download and install google Earth, can they not? So we all have access to a map making tool that the navigators and cartographers of old would have given their eye-teeth for.
But what if the intended purpose behind a map's design wasn't to inform: but to dis-inform?
Maps & Deliberate Deception.
Please repeat the time zone counting exercise.
Original image courtesy of Sky and Telescope Magazine (via EarthSky.org)
I put this animated gif image together using a jpeg file that is widely featured on several websites. It originally appeared in an article by Donald Olson: who describes himself as a 'forensic astronomer' at Texas State University (which doesn't actually have an astronomy department – according to the University's on-line curriculum), and Steve Hutcheon: an Australian astronomer, in the February 2013 issue of Sky and Telescope Magazine.
Please be aware, I am not claiming that either Olson or Hutcheon were responsible for the massive discrepancy that distorts the geographical and time zone information conveyed by this image – they mightn't have even been aware of it. But of one thing we can be sure – that discrepancy is so massive: continental Africa, in it's entirety, has been moved eastwards FFS, it cannot be anything other than deliberate.
So what, exactly, is this map supposed to convey? The red dots you see in the image above represent the locations from which observers witnessed The Great Canadian Meteor Procession of 9 February 1913. Olson and Hutcheon had undertaken an investigation into this extraordinary event and published their findings in Sky and Telescope Magazine which is aimed at the amateur astronomer. So – as far as I am aware – this image hasn't appeared in any academic publications/papers where it would have been subjected to the rigours of the peer-review process.
Now what was it – about the 1913 event: and the timescale over which it played out – that required this massively blatant application of disinformation to deliberately obscure it's true nature?
My friends, what was seen in the skies over Canada – and around the world – in 1913 weren't meteors: they were UFOs. This is what they don't want you to know.
And I can prove it.
Please read this article:
Acknowledgments and Reciprocal Links:
Time Zone Maps:
TZM 1 (animated gif)
The author of this work claims 'fair use': with regard to all materials used, in the interests of open and informed debate.
There is probably more disinformation out there concerning UFOs and extraterrestrial visitation than on any other issue. Why is this?
Aliens are visiting Planet Earth for a reason. If you want to understand why they are here please read: