Can you define what, 'To be free', actually means? Perhaps youv'e got a nice, pithy little homily that perfectly describes 'Freedom' in a couple of short sentences? If so then perhaps you could write it down and post it somewhere for us all to read.
I mean, when you refer to 'Freedom' are you talking about being 'Free', to do something that you aren't able to at the moment? Or perhaps you are talking about being, 'Free', of the impositions and obligations placed upon you by others?
When we talk about 'freedom', what is it – exactly – that we are talking about? Are we – all of us - even talking about the same thing?
Freedom – and how to define it – isn't as straightforward a concept as most people would imagine. Yet still some insist on using phrases such as: 'The Free World'. Indeed, there are those that believe themselves to be living in such a state of grace: 'In the land of the free'. But have these people ever taken the time – and expended the necessary intellectual effort – to examine what freedom is and so determine whether or not they actually possess it?
I think not.
Far too many of us have been persuaded - too many of us have accepted without question - that democracy: as it is currently constituted in the developed, western world, equates with freedom.
How can participating in a charade: called an election, every four years, and voting for people whom we wouldn't trust as far as we could spit, be considered, 'Freedom'? How, indeed, can it be called democracy?
Blair, Bush, Cheney and Condoleeza Rice, et al, lied to us about Iraq and over a million innocent people died as a result.
Tell me, when were we ever consulted about our participation in such hideous slaughter?
They also lied to us about Afghanistan and the bastards that succeeded them in office are still lying to us about Afghanistan.
When are they going to come clean and tell us that this war and occupation are being prosecuted on behalf of the energy corporations that need a pipe-line route out – across Afghanistan – for the natural gas that lies under the ground in Turkmenistan (a brutally corrupt shamocracy/dictatorship) next door? The pipeline that will bring this wealth out to the World has to transit Afghanistan. There are two other possible routes: one through Russia and the other through Iran. Neither of these is acceptable to America. America has to control the flow of this material so as to ensure that – when it is sold on the markets – the currency used for every transaction is the American Dollar. If America fails in this then the dollar: already weakened by the truly colossal amount of debt swamping the US economy - and already being abandoned by some of the emerging economies - will lose its status as the World's first reserve currency and the Great Dollar Empire will fall.
This perfectly illustrates the fact that – when it comes to the big issues – we aren't even told what those issues are. How can we as electors make informed choices when we aren't given the relevant information with which to make those choices?
And then, of course, there is Iran. It doesn't matter which of your country's political parties that you vote for at the next election – the banks and big oil want Iran to be attacked and brought to its knees so that they can plunder its economy and natural resources – and your government: whether of the left, right or center, is going to oblige them. And this despite the total lack of any credible evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program.
Now where in this grand scheme is your personal point of view being taken into account? Think carefully. In all liklihood war against Iran will spread to engulf the Middle East and then the entire World. Is this what you want? If not then how are you going to get that message across? By voting for some snake-oil salesman: that promises one thing, and then does the opposite, at the next election?
I don't think so.
And what about your current financial status? You might not, at the moment, have any unpaid loans outstanding with your bank but you still – nonetheless – owe the banking system tens of thousands of Dollars/Euros/Pounds (whatever). This is because your government indebted you with the privately owned, criminally corrupt banking cartel on your behalf. They did this: under the auspices of the bail-out regime, because the banks told them to do this. Now if our governments weren't allowed to exercise any other options in that situation, where did it leave us? What democratic options/choices were we allowed to exercise? Answer: zero, zilch. So we are now left in an impossible situation: trying to pay off our debts to the banks using money – created by the banks – that has interest attached at source. Ergo, the more money we pay back, the more interest we incur. Therefore: despite all the lies our governments tell us to the contrary, the national debt that we owe to the banks cannot – ever – be repaid in full. They've got us all going round in circles here: on a treadmill that we can never get off. So we need to ask ourselves: when was it – exactly – that we elected to place ourselves in this impossible situation?
Furthermore, it is this situation with the banks: the way in which they are now dictating economic policy – think austerity here – directly to our governments that reveals exactly who it is that exercises executive power over our economies. So what is the point of voting a government: of whatever cosmetic complexion (there aren't any real differences between political parties despite what their manifestos claim), into office when it is the banks that are running the show?
No, our personal points of view have no relevance for the elites that really control our World. And, by casting our worthless votes, we are just participating in the Grand Delusion. All that the usurers: the money lenders in the temple, want from us is blind obedience. Stay home, shut up and watch the TV. (I could have added: 'You dumb-ass, useless mouths', for this is what they sneeringly perceive us to be).
Now, if you are happy to continue deluding yourself that everything in the garden is hunky dory, you needn't read any further.
On the other hand, if you wish to explore ways in which we might circumvent the power of the elites, and seize back control over our own lives – then please – read on.
The concept that we really should be looking at here is devolution. Devolution involves the de-centralization of power from a central government to the regions that comprise a country. Here in the UK for example, we have seen the limited devolvement of power from London, with the setting up of parliaments in both Wales and Scotland. There are those in Scotland, though, whom deem this insufficient and actively seek secession from the United Kingdom altogether. (I say, good luck to them.)
Now what I have in mind is to take the concept of devolution: as described above, and apply its principles in a radically extreme fashion. Instead of just devolving power on a regional basis, we go all the way: we devolve soveriegn power directly to/upon the individual citizen.
If you want to be truly free, and take back control over your own life and future, you have to assume the responsibilities of governance. I know this sounds like a pretty tall order but you should bear in mind that politicians do not actively run countries. Virtually all of the work required to manage a country's day-to-day affairs is performed by civil servants/administrators. This will still be the case under a directly democratic system.
So how would we go about placing ourselves at the heart of the decision making process?
The key word here is consultation. We now possess the technical ability: made available to us by advances in computer technology, to collect, process and store enormous amounts of information. It is this ability that makes devolution-to-the-max possible, for with it we are now able to consult with – and register the aspirations of – an entire population.
This is, pretty much, how it will work. Everyone is given access to a computer. Throughout the calendar year: each month perhaps, a large tranche of electors will be selected completely at random. Those selected must then make themselves available to be consulted. This will involve sitting down and filling in questionaires on a computer terminal. They will also be given the opportunity to propose legislation of their own. Once an elector has been selected and consulted their name will then be eliminated from the selection process for the rest of that calendar year. In this way the random selection process will eventually require all those of electoral age to submit themselves for consultation.
Any interference with this process: such as the covert manipulation of the data collected, will be deemed treasonable and carry a mandatory ten year prison sentence.
Once the aspirations of the populace have been made manifest in this manner they will be passed into law and enacted/actioned by salaried civil servants/administrators who will be paid in accordance with their ability to deliver the wishes of the people. Should they under perform in any respect, we simply fire them.
However, we will need more than just a consultation process.
We are also going to need a Bill of Universal Rights that defines what it means to be a citizen. This will set out: what we are – and are not - free to do, what and whom we are protected from, and what our responsibilities are. One of the main reasons we will need this bill is to protect the rights of minorities from being infringed by a prejudiced majority acting against them. Under a directly democratic system there will be no persecution directed toward anybody. Everybody's rights will be held sacrosanct under the law. And no laws will be enacted that contravene this first principle.
Another thing we are going to need – and this by the shed load – is information. We cannot, ourselves, determine how to respond to any given issue if we are not even aware that there is a situation that requires our attention. This is how it stands at the moment. Our governments deal with 'issues' in secret: often using subterfuge to dress a situation up to make it appear like something else altogether.
Take Afghanistan for instance. Afghanistan - we are told – is all about spreading the democratic principle and ensuring that Afghan girls receive an education. But we already know the ugly truth of this situation don't we. Afghanistan – as we have already seen - is all about the natural gas deposits in Turkmenistan next door.Then there was the bullshit they told us about Saddam Hussein. We were told: amongst other things, that this guy had to go because he was a murderous dictator. And so he was. But they conveniently neglected to inform us that he had always been a murderous dictator. And that they have always known this. George Bush Snr knew this when he presented Saddam with a cake baked by his wife, Barbara. What changed things during G W Bush's tenure in the White House was Saddam's decision to reject the US Dollar in favour of the Euro in payment for Iraq's oil exports. (Challenging the supremacy of the World's numero uno, privately issued, debt based currency in this fashion has always proven fatal. Ask any assassinated American President or Gaddafi's ghost) In fact, our governments, and those they really represent: the banksters and corporations, have never had a problem with dictators per se. Check out the CIA's record for creating dictatorships – you'll see what I mean.
There is a valuble lesson to be learned here. That is: if we continue to place our trust in politicians that keep secrets – that keep vital information from us - and lie about the true nature of World events then we will, ultimately, be led into wars that only serve the interests of the 1%. So think about it, if we get rid of the politicians, we also get rid of the lies and secrets. Indeed, we might, if direct democracy takes hold and spreads around the globe, even put an end to war altogether. Now wouldn't that be something.
You will, I hope, by now appreciate that democracy cannot exist in the absence of information – in the absence of truth. This is why, under a directly democratic, totally transparent system, there will be no secrecy.
Finally, there is one last ingredient that we'll need to make direct democracy work and free us all from enslavement under a debt based monetary system controlled by the privately owned banks. (I have written about this subject at greater length in a previous article.) We need to exercise our soveriegn right to issue our own currencies that are free of debt. We need to take back the Money Power. At the moment the total amount of money in circulation within any given economy is controlled entirely by the banks. This gives the banks the power to hold us all to ransom. We either do what the banks want us to do: which is communicated to us via our governments (the semblance of democracy has to be maintained), or the banks will severely contract the supply of money and cause a recession/depression. They are also capable of upping the ante even further to bring about catastrophic financial collapse. This is the bottom line folks. This is the yoke that you currently wear around your neck. What is more, the banks are – at the moment – deliberately reducing the supply of money (see my last article). Why? Because they want to extend and entrench their power over us. They want us to go to war, and have us all live under martial law forevermore.
This is serious shit people. And we all need to wake up to the fact. (Please give the guy next to you a nudge.) The Money Power cannot be left under the control of the banks. It rightfully belongs to us, so we must set up our own monetary system and take it back from them.
To finish up here I would ask my readers to consider the events that are, right now, unfolding around the world. Specifically I would ask you all to ponder the significance of the many democracy movements that are emerging everywhere, with people taking to the streets in defiance of the brutal repression: coordinated at the highest levels of government, finance and industry, deployed against them. Ask yourselves: what do these people want? They march, and sometimes they are killed as they march. But still they march. What is it that these people believe in so passionately, that drives them to do this? They are obviously dissatisfied with democracy as it is currently constituted. Yet this is still their call: 'Democracy!' What kind of democracy is it that these brave souls seek? Perhaps they aren't that sure themselves. They just know there has to be another way.
Which is really all I've shown you here. Just another way. The thing is – if we are to live in a free and fair world – then it is probably the only way.
Peace, Love & Respect
This article is a companion piece to 'The Value of Money', which you will find by scrolling down this page.
The dialogue between extraterrestrial civilizations and the human race has already begun. And it's about time you started paying attention: because the subject matter of this discussion has profound implications for our collective future here on Planet Earth. So, if you want to find out how you can take part in this historic conversation, all you need do is read on.
The basic message: that our visitors from across the Cosmos are trying to communicate to us, couldn't be simpler; they want us to live in peace. They have a very good reason for wanting this. And it isn't just a case of them wanting what is best for the human race. They also want what is best for themselves.
Now, in order to understand ET's motivations here, we need to understand something about the fundamental nature of the Universe: and the true nature of existence itself. Most people are familiar with Einstein's concept of 'space-time', but how many have really understood it? You need to think about it this way: space (the warp) and time (the weft) are woven together to form the fabric of the Cosmos. This fabric – imagine it to be a tapestry if you like – extends outwards in all directions to infinity. Now to cross that fabric in any meaningful way – to travel interstellar, or even intergalactic, distances – we need to overcome more than just the spatial dimensionality of our reality; we also need to conquer the temporal dimensionality bound up within space-time. Therefore, we cannot just cross space – we must also travel through time.
( Achieving this mightn't be as difficult as many would have you believe. Please download – and read – this pdf document: Alien Technology Explained.)
And this is what worries ET. At the moment alien technology is, perhaps, a million years more advanced than ours. At the moment we do not threaten extraterrestrials in any way. But what happens if we achieve interstellar travel? What happens when we are able to travel back through time and attack ET's homeworld whilst it is still in its technological infancy?
So ask yourself - what would you do if you were The Extraterrestrial? Bear in mind that our visitors have already seen what we do to our own kind. They have witnessed the horrendous crimes that we perpetrate against each other. Now, if you were ET, would you allow us: along with our pathologically murderous mentality, to spread out across the Milky Way Galaxy?
This is why we must – as a race – grow up and embrace peace. We must do this for our own sakes and for the generations yet to come. We must do this so that: at some future date, we can stand - as equals - face to face with ET and embrace him.
Now let's get back to that conversation and look at some background material.
On the 16 September 1994 an alien visitor to our world delivered a terrifying message: describing the nuclear apocalypse that will befall us if we do not change our suicidal behaviour, to a group of 62 schoolchildren at Ariel Elementary School in Ruwa, a small rural township situated 20 kilometers from Harare in Zimbabwe. I am not going to set out the testimony to this encounter: elicited from these children by celebrated psychiatrist John E Mack, here. Instead I would like the reader to hear this remarkable testimony delivered directly from the children themselves.
Please use this link: to a short YouTube video, to begin your research into this event.
Personally, I found the guiless, wide-eyed sincerity with which these young students tell their disturbing story to be totally convincing.
We must also consider the motives of the messenger here. What prompted this alien to cross the vastness of interstellar space to deliver his message? Why did he choose 62 schoolchildren – instead of a powerful head of state – to be the recipients of his dire warning? There are two logical conclusions that can be drawn here. The first of these is that alien civilizations are concerned about our future and wish to communicate their concerns to us. The second is that they don't trust our 'leaders' to pass on their message accurately and honestly. They chose the children because they knew that their message would be passed on without being modified to suit anyone's agenda or political considerations.
By now you should be aware of at least one thing for sure: that message is intended for you. How you will respond to it, however, is entirely up to yourself.
Besides attempting to communicate his concerns by telepathically implanting apocalyptic visions of mankind's demise in the minds of young schoolchildren, ET has also taken direct action that clearly demonstrates his opposition to our weapons of mass destruction. Evidence to support this emerged at the first Disclosure Project presentation: organized by Dr Steven Greer.
Among the many eyewitnesses - to otherworldly encounters - that took the stage on May 9th 2001 was a guy called Robert Salas. Mr Salas had served as a captain in the United Sates Air Force back in the sixties and seventies. His testimony at the Disclosure Project centered around an incident that occurred in 1967 when he was serving as a deputy missile combat crew commander at an ICBM (inter-continental ballistic missile: equipped with warheads that possess vastly more destructive power than the Hiroshima bomb) launch facility in Montana. The facility consisted of ten launch silos: each containing one Minuteman missile. Whilst on duty: in the underground command center, at the site near Malstrom, Montana, he received a phone call from the above-ground guard post at the main gate to the complex. It was the NCO in charge of security. In a panic stricken voice the sergeant told Salas that there was a, 'Glowing red,' saucer shaped craft hovering just outside the main entrance. 'It's just sitting there...what do we do?' Salas told him to hang on while he went to inform the base commander: Lt. Fred Meiwald. It was as he spoke to his CO that the first alarm sounded. Both men looked across to a panel of annunciator lights: that indicated the status of the missiles under their control, to see that one of these was now off-line. As the alarm continued to sound another soon followed. Then two more missiles went down simultaneously. It wasn't long before all ten missiles at the base had been rendered 'inoperable'. Twenty-four hours would pass before maintenance crews could bring the missiles back on-line.
In the aftermath of the incident Salas discovered that the same fate had: on that very same night, befallen another Minuteman base located 20 miles away from Malstrom. UFOs were reported in the vicinity – and another ten missiles were then 'taken off-line.'
These events occurred at the height of the cold war so it should come as no surprise that nothing was known about them - outside of the small circle of witnesses and the officers that 'debriefed' them - at the time. This was, after all, the era of 'deterrence' and 'mutually assured destruction,' - and neither side was going to communicate to the other that their nuclear capability had been compromised.
Since Salas stepped forward in 2001, more people: present at the bases on the night of 16 March 1967, have also come forward to corroborate his story.
There has, also, been other cases involving UFOs and 'interference' with nuclear weapons technology. These include the Rendelsham Forest incident from 1980. Here UFOs were witnessed over-flying the US Air Force installations at RAF Bentwaters and Woodbridge and shooting 'beams of light' down into bunkers that contained nuclear warheads.
Similar tales are also now emerging from Russia, mainly centered on a secret facility at Kapustin Yar: Russia's 'Area 51'. One of these even relates how a UFO appears to have 'initiated' a launch sequence count-down. Luckily – for us – the sequence terminated when the UFO left the area.
And it doesn't end there. In his book, 'UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites,' author and researcher Robert Hastings presents us with a history of this phenomenon that stretches from as far back as 1948, to as recently as 2003. When researching this work the author interviewed 120 eyewitnesses and collated together declassified documents from many different official sources. This is serious evidence presented in a book that addresses an extremely serious issue. Evidence enough for us to conclude that the extraterrestrials themselves are very, very serious - and persistent - about their interest in our weapons of mass destruction.
So now ask yourself: 'What are our visitors trying to communicate to us by persisting with this pattern of behavior?' Think about it. They are temporarily disabling these weapons. They are not destroying them altogether. And they are doing this repeatedly in order to draw our attention to the fact that they are, indeed, doing it.
There is only one conclusion that can be drawn here. The extraterrestrials are asking us a question, they are offering us a way out of the nuclear nightmare. They are clearly telling us that if we send them an unequivocal indication that we desire to be free of all weapons of mass destruction, then they will oblige us by destroying – or otherwise rendering useless – the weapons currently held in stockpiles around the world.
I would now ask the reader to examine their conscience. How can we not send ET that indication? We owe it to ourselves. We owe it to our children and grandchildren. We owe it to the future viability of all life on Planet Earth.
You and I both know that our governments will not do anything to end the madness of WMDs and war. Quite the contrary. They are currently engaged in preparing us for war: first against Syria, and then Iran. They are doing all this at the behest of the banks and corporations. You should also note that those responsible for starting this war will survive it. Even if this war leads to a full-blown nuclear exchange, the warmongers will be safely cocooned underground in their bomb shelters: built with your tax money. So they will survive and millions of us – our sons and daughters, grandparents and grandchildren, brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles – will die.
But this war need never happen. We have been given an option: by our visitors from across the Cosmos, that – should we choose to exercise it – could free us from the nightmare and put an end to war forevermore.
Well, are you ready to exercise that option?
If you are - this is what you need to do. Visit Change.org. In the 'Search petitions' box type: 'End the Madness'. Hit the search button. This will take you to the page featuring my petition. My petition calls upon, 'All intelligent entities of goodwill, including the entire human race, to help us achieve our desire to rid our world of all weapons of mass destruction and put an end to war'. Next, fill in the required fields and electronically sign this petition. That's it. The whole process should take you about five minutes.
Alternatively, you can hit this link and save yourself some time:
Now, if I am not mistaken you – the reader – will have a couple of questions for me at this point.
You should also be aware that this issue is becoming time critical. ET – I believe – will shortly make his presence here on Planet Earth so obvious that the reality of alien visitation will become undeniable. He will do this by re-staging an event that he first staged a century ago on the 9 February 1913.
Artist: Gustave Hahn's, impression of the Great Canadian Meteor Procession of 1913.
Despite the title given this event we are probably looking at – what was then and will be again – a world-wide phenomenon. This time around, though, the event will be captured on digital video by millions of people. These objects will be clearly seen to perform manoeuvres that meteors cannot. This is because they aren't meteors.
I present my evidence – to back up this claim – here:
So it is now time to seize the day. People are soon to learn that everything that they have been told – everything that they believe they know – is a lie. Politics, economics, science and religion are all about to be shaken to their very core. Listen to me very carefully. Our time has come. Remember the children of Ruwa? That alien didn't land on the Whitehouse lawn and ask to speak to the President of the United States. He doesn't want to hear from the President of the United States. He wants to hear from you.
Further reasons why you should sign my petition.
By signing you will be sending a clear message – to the warmongers – that you are not willing to fight in, or condone, a war that only serves the interests of a select few.
You will also be sending a clear message – to ET – that you are a mature, responsible adult who is committed to peace and doesn't present a threat to anyone of any race or creed: whether of extraterrestrial origin or otherwise.
Finally, there is also something else that you should consider. Imagine millions of people, from all over the world, all calling out for the same thing: PEACE! When all those people finally understand that they can speak as one - they will realise that they can act as one. They will realise that we are not enemies, and they will stop listening to the politicians that lie – and connive with the banks and corporations – to convince them otherwise.
Such a development: the world rising and speaking as one, would – of course – make headline news. It would become the hottest topic discussed on the TV and radio. TV and radio channels broadcast programs using electromagnetic radiation. And that radiation isn't confined to the circles of the world. It propagates outward: into the immensity of the Cosmos, at the speed of light. So ask yourself one last question: who is out there, right now, monitoring our broadcasts? You got it, ET will hear us. He will hear our response to his question and he will react.
Now please sign my petition. And I promise you – you will believe.
Peace, Love & Respect
This article is available: in pdf format, for download.
If the reader would like to help me free our world of all weapons of mass destruction, and put an end to war, please forward this article: as an attachment to an email, to your friends.